A
Daughter's Poem
When I need to be rocked in
Or
rubbed on my chin
Who does it ???
My Pa!!!!
When the
closet monster comes
He fights them and scares them
Who is
he ???
My Pa!!!!
When things are wrong
And all mixed
up
Who makes things better???
My Pa!!!!
When Ma and
my sissy [X]el
Cast an evil kind of spell
Who protects me
???
My Pa!!!!
If Pa didn’t exist
Things would be a
mess
Who is always there
My Pa!!!
Pa
Pa Pa
Pa
Corruption,
Torture, Criminal and Human Rights Violations
by
Officials
and Judiciary of the States of the United States
(See
Below
For Some Cases of Judicial Misconduct Across the US)
in
Violation of:
the States' own and federal Laws
and Constitutions,
the United Nations Conventions and Treaties,
to wit
On Human and Political Rights, Charter 77, Rights of
Children,
Family Rights &
in contravention of every norm of human
rights, decency and
morality.
(“Civilized”
Re-Defined)
"The
[above]
matter
[of
atrocities, Due Process Violations, criminal
and
fraudulent activities]
is
before the United States
Congress".
(Authorized
Statement)
“The
limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom
they
oppose.”
(Frederick
Douglass, 1817-1895)
“As
long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of
the children, the people will
happily endure almost any
curtailment of liberty and almost any
deprivation.
”
(Mein
Kampf, Adolf Hitler)
Compare
with US' deliberate, unconstitutional and criminal destruction of
families!
“That
it is the view of the United States that States Party to the
Covenant should wherever possible refrain from imposing any
restrictions or limitations on the exercise of the rights
recognized and protected by the Covenant, even when such
restrictions and limitations are permissible under the terms of
the Covenant. For the United States, article 5, paragraph 2, which
provides that fundamental human rights existing in any State Party
may not be diminished “.
“The
United States declares that it
will continue to adhere to the requirements and constraints of its
Constitution in respect to all such restrictions and limitations.
(3) That the United States declares that the right referred to in
article 47 may be exercised only in accordance with international
law."
(signed
by the United States on 10.05.1977, Date receipt of Inst.
06.08.1992)
(United
Nation International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and
the International
Convention
on
the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination and
Convention on Human Rights.)
The
US Constitution is now only a “dead
letter”.
(Dr.
Roger Roots, Esq., J.D.,
Attorney)
Do
You Know What Is Happening To You? If Not, [1]S[9]e[8]e[4]
For
Yourself!
Simply Stated:
We are seeking and demanding that Perpetrators of such Criminal Misconduct and Human Rights atrocities be prosecuted. To this end, we are gathering verified affidavits and evidentiary documentation and records of such atrocities perpetrated by the judiciary and officials in ALL the 50 States of the United States for submission to US federal and International bodies for investigation, law enforcement and prosecution purposes. You are cordially invited, indeed urged, to submit your affidavit regarding your case.
In
the US, every year multitude of children are kidnapped
by
the State courts, in conspiracy with county prosecutors and higher
state judiciaries, and given to one parent (overwhelmingly to
females) in order to collect extortion “incentive” kickback
money ($Billions annually) from the willingly defrauded and
colluding federal government (social engineering). In a vast
majority of these cases, the children are abused and suffer, with
the knowledge, acquiescence and often participation of the said
judiciary, from “Stockholm
Syndrome” due
to perpetration of “Parental
Alienation” in
“Hostile
[and unlawful] Custody Environment”
just
so that the states, their courts, judiciaries and county
prosecutors get their share of the kidnap
“incentive” money, i.e. extortion money under Title IV-D (42
U.S.C. 651,
et
seq.).
For a greater understanding and in non-legal language, read
this cold (without the individual drama and heartache of the
hundreds of thousands of lives, families and children it has
destroyed), detailed and illuminating Title
IV-D account (“MONEY
IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL”, By Paul M. Clements, July 2008) and
links to official figures and evidence
of the institutionalized fraud and deception nationwide indicating
the depth of shame, disgrace, moral depravity and bankruptcy and
criminality the United States knowingly and deliberately has sunk
to for greed and control upon fathers, mothers and their children
using “mothers” as its tool of implementation of such criminal
and human rights atrocity against families under its
jurisdiction.
The
conclusion
has to be that if
you have family and value your children and their future, do NOT
come to live in the United States, where in pursuit of the New
World Order, the Family (the fabric of society) is deliberately
and systematically destroyed by its corrupt federal and states'
governments!
IS YOUR CHILD NEXT TO BE KIDNAPPED FROM YOU and/or YOUR RIGHTS VIOLATED BY THE STATE AND ITS COURTS, AIDED AND ABETTED BY US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, ITS COURTS AND AGENCIES, FOR PROFIT ???
"No
country -- certainly not the United States -- is free of
corruption,
and
no country should lecture others on how to eliminate
it."
"I
remain convinced that there is no more important area in the fight
against
corruption than the challenge for us within the law enforcement
and
justice sectors to keep our own houses
clean."
"Corruption
in the agencies charged with enforcing our laws not only
threatens
communities by allowing dangerous criminals to roam free, it
also
undermines the confidence of our citizens in law enforcement and
the
criminal justice system. The same is true with respect to judicial
corruption.
We must all, in our own countries, lead the fight to ensure
integrity
within our police and judicial systems. The same is true with
respect
to judicial corruption."
“We
must all, in our own countries, lead the fight to ensure integrity
within
our police and judicial systems.“
“I
turn now to the third dimension of corruption: the moral
dimension.
In
the end, we must acknowledge morality is an essential foundation
of
law.
Governments are reflective of the societies they serve. Even with
strong
law enforcement and preventive measures, there will still be those
tempted
by corruption, and those willing to corrupt. We must come to a
recognition,
personally and culturally, that corruption is not just a violation
of
law, not just an economic disadvantage, and not merely a political
problem,
but
that it is morally wrong. ”
(John
D. Ashcroft, United States Attorney General
Himself One of the
Worst Violators of Civil Rights and the Constitution
in remarks
to the Second Global Forum on Fighting Corruption!)
“THE
ONE GREAT PRINCIPLE OF [THE] LAW IS TO MAKE BUSINESS FOR ITSELF.”
(Charles
Dickens, Bleak House)
The
projects
and
actions herein for redress are applicable to ALL States, their
judiciary and officials as well as those of federal courts with
appropriate and relevant modifications (Contact
Dr.
Sanjari).
Everyone is invited and encouraged to submit
any
and all misconduct by ALL States' and federal judiciary and
officials for documentation herein.
(The
inset caption is for your amusement only! It simply indicates the
hypocrisy of the judicial system.)
Themis "The Goddess of Justice"
Criminal
and constitutional Violations,
by the judiciary often include, but not limited to: Fraud, and
Conspiracy to defraud, Obstruction of Justice, Endangering
Children's Safety and Well- Being, Child abuse, Lying in official
court documents, Falsifying court records, Threats against
parties, Conspiracy to cover up fraud, Violations of Oaths of
Office, Treason Against the United States, ... with the Knowledge
and Acquiescence of, and Cover up by the State's Appellate and
Supreme Courts (and acquiescence of federal courts in cases
federal suit is filed against said State judiciary and officials).
In each State, ultimately
it is the State Chief Justice MUST bear responsibility
for
the criminal corruption of State judges under his/her watch.
The
United
States Supreme Court (“USSC”) aids and abets the corruption by
deliberately burying
its head in the sand while its own federal courts (e.g. CA7,
USDC-IN, but to name a couple) unconstitutionally and unlawfully
continue to ignore and violate the Constitution and USSC's own
directives where concerns the plight
of people who
seek fundamental, civil and human rights remedy and redress for
atrocities and corruption perpetrated by States' judiciaries and
courts !!! This capitulation to the states' judicial corruption
erodes the authority of the federal laws and Constitution and
people's protection under them. Hence, it is a deliberate betrayal
of people's rights and trust!
The USSC is in direct and
express violation of the Constitution by declining to hear
people's Petitions (For Writ of Certiorari) to provide “redress”
in the face of lower federal and particularly state courts'
corruption ????? Such neglect and failure places the United States
in direct violation of international treaties and Compacts (such
as United
Nations Conventions On Human and Political Rights, Charter 77,
Rights of Children)
it has signed and ratified!!!!!! Hence, rendering the United
States in further violation of norms of humanity, decency and
morality, not to mention international law!!!!!!
The Constitution For the United States
(For the many judges and attorneys who have not read it, ignore it, or deliberately violate it! Hence, committing treason against the United States)
+++
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which
shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or
which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States,
shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every
State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or
Laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding." SUPREMACY
CLAUSE -U.S. Constitution. Art. VI, Paragraph 2.
+++
When a judge acts intentionally and knowingly to deprive a person
of his constitutional rights he exercises no discretion or
individual judgment; he acts no longer as a judge, but as a "
minister" of his own prejudices. [386
U.S. 547, 568].
+++ A judge is liable for injury
caused by a ministerial act; to have immunity the judge must be
performing a judicial function. See, e. g., Ex parte Virginia, 100
U.S. 339 ; 2 Harper & James, The
Law of Torts 1642-1643 (1956).
+++ The presence of
malice and the intention to deprive a person of his civil rights
is wholly incompatible with the judicial function.
++++ When
the state in the instant case is one of the perpetrators and
violators, there can be no expectation of just, indeed any, relief
from it. The State cannot cause a federal violation, and then try
to prohibit litigants from seeking redress in the federal courts
for those same violations (i.e. the state cannot violate our
fundamental rights, and then try to have us dismissed out of
federal court for seeking vindication of those rights) ' "We
have long recognized that a state cannot create a transitory cause
of action and at the same time destroy the fight to sue on that
transitory cause of action in any court having jurisdiction",
Tennessee Coal, Iron & R, Co.
v. George, 233 U.S. 354, 360 (1914)' cited in Marshall
v. Marshall (2006), US Supreme Court.
Judges' oath of office includes the undertaking to uphold the laws and Constitution of the United States. Any Judge violating such undertakings loses jurisdiction, resulting in his orders being VOID, and he himself commits a treasonable offence against the United States.
Frederick
Douglass'
Speech
as bears relevance to the slavery perpetrated upon the people,
especially fathers, by the States' and federal officials under the
color of law and in violation of the US Constitution and
international treaties and charters it has signed and ratified and
human
rights.
(“Civilized”
Re-Defined)
Announcements,
News & Information
-
02.16.2009: Occasions to name a judge for positive conduct to
uphold the law and the Constitution are extremely rare! However,
we'd like to acknowledge the following members of the State of
Minnesota judiciary: Justice
Paul Anderson,
Judge
Debra Hedlund,
Judge
James Dehn
and
Judge
Jack Nordby
who
have pledged to uphold the law and the Constitution to support
petition
for Grand Jury in Minnesota. People
of all states are encouraged to study their respective state and
federal constitutions with a view to utilising the provisions
therein regarding Grand Jury rights to bring to account their
corrupt officials and judiciary,
as Ms. Nancy Lazaryan has commendably done herein in the face of
opposition and non-cooperation by prosecutors and other judges.
“Courts
have taken the view that the authorization of a special grand jury
may exist or function
contemporaneously with the regular grand jury, and does not
violate constitutional provisions guaranteeing the right to
presentment or indictment by a grand jury for infamous crimes and
felonies.
People
ex rel. Ferrill v Graydon,
333 Ill 429, 164 NE 832; State
ex rel. Doerfler v Price,
101 Ohio St 50, 128 NE 173.
“At
common law the grand jurors could be summoned by open venire”.
Rogers
v. People,
104 Colo 594, 94 P2d 453.”
Although
this communication refer to events in Minnesota, nevertheless the
information therein may be a useful tool in invoking Grand Jury to
investigate judicial and official corruption elsewhere.
-
02.16.2009: Massachusetts
Supreme Court Chief Justice, Margaret H. Marshall, pictured
right,
delivered
a speech to the American Bar Association's (“ABA”) House of
Delegates attorneys stating that state courts are in “crisis”
and urges in which she urges attorneys to defend the courts
whenever possible. She is correct in her assessment of crisis in
state courts as they are beset by corrupt judges. However, she is
wrong in identifying the courts as victims deserving assistance
and defence.
To
the contrary, it is the people going before the courts that need
to be defended against the prevalent and daily routine of
corruption, constitutional and legal violations of their rights,
families and possessions by the miscreant judges. No intelligent
and aware people could take Ms. Marshall's comments seriously as
scary as they are since they represent a new onslaught upon the
rights of people by the judiciary in intimidating and choking any,
rare as it is, expression of truth by an attorney. Obviously Ms.
Marshall is doing an
"O'Connor"
(ex US Supreme Court Justice on a campaign of propaganda and
misrepresentation) job on the people. However, as aware her
audience of attorneys is of judicial corruption (many of them take
part in it), Ms. Marshall no doubt found them receptive not least
because vast majority of ABA members practice in state courts and
as such are under the tutelage of states supreme courts, i.e.
judiciaries like Ms. Marshall herself, who is currently the chair
of Conference of State Chief Justices (the states' and
territories' justices (see below the letter
sent to them recently). The response to her obvious attack on
electing judges (she and other judges in Massachusetts are
unelected and apparently only represent their own agenda and
judicial tyranny) is that whether elected or not, judges do not
apply the law and the Constitution anyway, and her, and those of
O'Connor's, remarks are merely designed to remove the chance
(where available) for people to decide through elections fate of
miscreant judges and make them all as unaccountable and tyrannical
as those in Massachusetts. It appears that when the courts do not
get absolute allegiance and obedience from lawyers, whom are
"encouraged" to do so via such coercive methods, the
said courts use their strong arm tactics and their monopoly of
power over attorneys to silence any expression in support of rule
of law. Such utterances by attorneys are extremely rare, yet on
the very few occasions that an honest attorney (very few and far
in between anywhere in the federal and state courts) does speak in
support of the rule of law and the Constitution and against the
judicial abuse, he/she is drawn and quartered in public and
disbarred from practicing law. An example of such a sacrificed
attorney is Barbara C. Johnson one of a few and rare attorneys who
has spoken out against the judicial corruption in Massachusetts
courts under Ms. Marshall herself. And given that deeply corrupt
Massachusetts judges are not elected by the people, evidently Ms.
Marshall is advocating, by her speech, that the rest of the
country's courts (already corrupt to varying degrees) should
follow suit and rule by absolute power. [It maybe noted that, as
another example of judicial corruption and coercion, the Indiana
Chief Justice, Randall Terry Shepard, elected in UNOPPOSED
elections (!), too has and continues to commit crimes, to wit:
fraud, case fixing, conspiracy, and has coerced and suspended
attorneys (Michael A. Wilkins of Indiana and Jeffrey R. Learned of
Michigan) for speaking the truth and brought under his iron-fist
control (see below,
also New
York Times article). So, the question remains if electing
judges makes any difference to their adherence to the rule of law
and Constitution given their unconstitutional and unlawful
self-appointed immunity which protects them against crimes they
regularly, and in many cases, on daily basis commit while on the
bench! Evidence points to the fact that it may not. Maybe, after
all, as Ms. Marshall appears to imply, it would be better that
judges are not elected so that people would more easily recognise
and accept the judicial corruption that is so rampant by both
elected and unelected judges. Clearly,
the remedy has to be in the removal of the unconstitutional and
self-granted judicial immunity which would not only encourage
judges to truly apply the law, but also remove the need for
criticising the courts and the perceived need for “defending”
them.
Ms.
Marshall and other supreme courts judges have been advised
of such a sorely needed real
solution
if they want to recapture the respect and trust of the people in
their judiciaries. Alas, her, and other justices' having called
upon the praetorial guards to “defend” the corrupt judiciary
while boding ill, also signals her and her cohorts', as with many
other petty tyrants', intention of continuing to ride roughshod
over the Constitution, law and people's rights, “while Rome
burns”.
Judges are aware of the effects their tyrannical actions have on
the people before judges (in the case of supreme courts, the lazy
justices have given themselves the unconstitutional option of
picking and choosing if a case comes before them or not and NOT
providing appellate remedy to all who seek it as required under
the Constitution, a right that is also violated by the federal
Supreme Court justices) so they are fighting a rear-guard action
to pre-empt any recourse by the people. In addition, the vast
majority of attorneys are ALREADY in the pockets of the judiciary
either through commission or omission, and no doubt, her remarks
are designed to intimidate the rest into betraying their clients
and oaths of office and further shield and get into bed with
miscreant judges just so that they may be able to continue
practicing their trade. Obviously by seeking support for the
courts, Ms. Marshall is attempting to misrepresent the facts and
give the impression that it is the courts, and not the victimised
and wronged people before them, that are under attack and deserve
support and fair treatment. This is because the majority of people
who have not experienced and are not familiar with the courts and
the prevalent judicial corruption and who are not aware of their
own rights and Constitution, may still be under the misconception
that rule of law exists in courts and that complaints against the
judiciary are merely result of "sour grapes". This
majority is unaware of the long creeping judicial tyranny that
has, does and will continue to dispossess them and others of their
families, rights and possessions in one way or another. One should
remember and learn
from
history that it is precisely through such methods of
misrepresentation and propaganda by those in and with power (such
as Ms. O'Conner and their lackeys) that tyrants seek greater
control and tighten their corrupt noose around the people's necks.
Unfortunately, by the time the people come to realise it or act
upon it, it will have been too late, if it is not already!
-
02.14.2009: Organs of corrupt Indiana judicial system out of Adams
County, Indiana conspire to retaliate against and silence a Hawaii
father, Mr. Ricky Dyer,
allegedly
for “sending
dozens of threatening e-mails, leaving threatening phone messages
and making hundreds of harassing phone calls to Adams County
Prosecutor Christopher Harvey, Circuit Court Judge Frederick
Schurger and retired Superior Court Judge James Heimann.”
However,
such
accusations come on the heel of lawsuit
Mr. Dyer had filed against Prosecutor Christopher Harvey for
various criminal and constitutional violations against him and his
daughter after Mr. Dyer's former wife had kidnapped their daughter
from Hawaii and taken her to Adams county, Indiana, where she was
represented in court by Mr. Harvey who later, as the county
prosecutor(!), filed fraudulent charges under the Title
IV-D and had Mr. Dyer unlawfully extradited to Indiana
although the Hawaii court had jurisdiction of the case(!). Then,
judge
Schurger, while admitting that he and Indiana courts had no
jurisdiction in the case, nevertheless went ahead
and
ordered Mr. Dyer incarcerated!
Such is the brazen corruption routinely exercised in Indiana
courts all the way through its Supreme
Court. In defending Mr. Harvey and his crimes in the federal
lawsuit brought by Mr. Dyer, the Indiana deputy attorney general,
David
Arthur, got up to his old tricks of evading the truth and
misleading the federal court. Mr. Dyer's federal lawsuit was
dismissed without consideration of its merits and merely on the
erroneous technicality of immunity protecting official and
judicial corruption. This is a typical excuse, often unlawfully,
that federal judges utilise to provide cover for their brethren
state judges' and officials' criminal acts! After all, it is a
matter of protecting the perpetrators of the said crimes (upon the
parents, especially fathers) under the colour of law by the state
of Indiana alone to the tune
of $$$100,000,000.00s annually that is involved!
-
02.03.2009: Indiana - “Arrest
warrants have vanished
for thousands
of [] parents as a result of a
new
court policy.” In Marion County, parents involved in “child
support” issues “who skip court no longer face the threat of
jail.” Marion County Court Administrator Glenn Lawrence “said
the warrants were suspended to allow no-shows the chance to
explain why. He also said the county recently settled a case in
which a defendant was denied due process. “
'Now,
the courts can only order what's called a "body attachment".
"It's not really an arrest. It's a notice to bring them
before the court," Lawrence said.' No doubt the real motive
behind the move has been to protect the counties from lawsuit
damages for their habitual and corrupt practices of due process
violation rather than for any respect for the Constitution and
rights of “non-custodial” parents fleeced, defrauded and
criminalised by the state and its corrupt agencies (including the
very courts which issue these orders and counties' prosecutors who
unlawfully prosecute them) which reap monetary profit
by destroying families' lives under the unconstitutional Title
IV-D.
-
01.31.2009: “Ethicist Testifies
For Hunger-Striker's
Rights”. The
Hartford
Courant.
“A prison doctor
[Edward
Blanchette]
violated
professional standards when he force-fed William Coleman, even
though the inmate's 16-month hunger strike had threatened his
health,
a medical ethicist testified Friday in a hearing at Superior Court
in Hartford.” “Following
a patient's wishes regarding medical treatment is the most
important consideration,
said Arthur Caplan, a professor and director of the Center of
Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania.” ' "In my
opinion, a competent adult like Mr. Coleman has the right to
refuse any and all treatment," Caplan said.'
“The
Department of Corrections is asking Judge James T. Graham to make
permanent a temporary injunction he issued in January 2008 that
allows the state to force-feed Coleman, who was sentenced in 2005
to eight years for raping his wife. He says the hunger strike he
started in September 2007 is a protest against his conviction and
a corrupt judicial system.” “Caplan said two declarations by
the World Medical Association, signed by the American
Medical Association, contain guidelines that doctors should
respect a patient's request not to be treated, even
prisoners.”
The following is noteworthy:
A) Mr.
William Coleman, on hunger strike, has been unconstitutionally
jailed
based upon false allegations by his
former wife Jillian
Parle of
Waterbury, CT, as a means of leveraging in a child custody case
that further highlights the conspiracy amongst the judiciary,
county prosecutors and other states' agencies financially
profiting
under Title IV-D federal government incentive payments. Such false
allegations by women against their partners are advocated by many
lawyers and leveraged in child custody (and financial support)
matters and are encouraged by the state courts and prosecutors as
a way of reaping financial profit. Such unconstitutional
atrocities and tactics, not to mention the resulting torture in
this and other cases, are wide-spread in the U.S. and are utilised
by the federal government as a social-engineering tool.
B) Mr.
Coleman is incarcerated as a result of the corrupt judicial system
in Connecticut and other states of the United States. Hence, he
has every right to protest his innocence through hunger-strike.
The torture
orders, sought by deputy Attorney General Ann
Lynch,
issued by judge James
T. Graham
(pictured
here) of corrupt Connecticut Superior Courts, and carried out by
Dr.Edward
Blanchette of
the Connecticut Correction Facilities are
designed to cover up their atrocities in this and similar cases
from attracting more wide-spread attention in the event of Mr.
Coleman's death should he be allowed to exercise his
constitutional rights.
C)
As disgraceful, hypocritical and neglectful as the British
government's (Mr. Coleman is a British citizen and entitled to
every protection and assistance by the British government and its
representatives in the U.S.) ostensible silence and inaction are,
do they not indicate the said government's complicity in the U.S.
atrocities vis-a-vis torture, not least perpetrated upon its own
citizens? Although the British government may claim inability to
interfere in the internal affairs of a host country (the U.S.),
nevertheless when the said host country government perpetrates
atrocities unlawful under international laws
and even under its own laws, doesn't the British government have a
duty and obligation to protect its citizens who are victims of
such internationally forbidden atrocities?
D) How is it that
physicians at the CT Correctional Facilities who perpetrate
torture in this case are allowed to practice medicine at all by
the United States and the American Medical Association? Are such
ethical and legal atrocities a manifestation of torture culture
encouraged by the United States' other similar conduct elsewhere,
or is this the cause which has led t those other atrocities ?
We
demand that the American Medical Association revoke the medical
practice licenses and memberships of the physicians who have been
perpetrating such torture upon Mr. Coleman in this case as well as
upon others in other cases, particularly in view of such
physicians' violations of the international guidelines
signed by the AMA. Also see duties of physicians under the AMA
Professional
Responsibility and
Principles
of Medical Ethics .
-
01.29.2009: “Courts
can rescue kids from an alienating parent”.
The
Globe And Mail. “The
tide of opinion is turning against those who alienate their
children from the other parent. Courts are willing to show tough
love”. However, in the United State courts are corrupt and
conspire with state officials to force children into unlawful
custody of the alienating parent (mainly “mothers”) for the
sake of monetary profit
($$$100,000,000.00s annually) and incentives that they (the very
courts and judges who remake custody decisions unlawfully and in
conflict of interest), states' agencies and county prosecutors
receive from the federal government. They,
in prostituting their own and their judicial integrity, not only
do not have the true interest of children in mind or heart, but
also resort to facilitating such atrocities as parental alienation
against children for the said profit. (Examples abound on this
site alone.)
-
01.27.2009: Pennsylvania- "The two judges who led the Luzerne
County Court for the last seven years took $2.67 million in
payoffs for helping a private juvenile detention center reap
millions from county contracts, with one of the judges going so
far as to sentence children to detention over
the objections of juvenile probation officers to benefit the
center, federal prosecutors
alleged
Monday."
The
Times
Tribune. It appears that judicial corruption is only
investigated and punished when the victim is state and money is
involved leaving the people and their children exposed to the
mercy and atrocities of criminally corrupt judges. The
above false sentencing of children to detention is similar to
pervasive false criminalisation of fathers and deprivation of
their children and family life so that judges, counties,
prosecutors and states financially profit from the resulting
federal incentive paid under Title
IV-D fraud to these authorities for destroying families and
atrocities against fathers and children.
This
parallel could not be more similar to what is the government and
states are doing to fathers and children.
The difference is that in this reported case the county government
lost money so federal authorities took action against the said
judges. In
cases in which people are the victim, the federal agencies' ears
are deaf, and by extension and through their inaction they are
just as criminally liable and responsible as the perpetrating
judges whose crimes the federal authorities ignore!
-
01.26.2009: In a communication
to the chief justices of all 50 states, District Of Columbia, and
5 Territories (see
below),
Dr. Sanjari, et al., asked for their views about, and
sought their support for, eliminating the self-assigned judicial
immunity that protects corrupt judges against any effective remedy
sought by the victims of their criminal and administrative
misconduct. Judicial immunity not only does not “interfere with
administration of justice”, but indeed actively encourages
dishonesty, fraud, criminal acts, ignorance of law and deprivation
of fundamental constitutional rights by judges who'd always hide
under the cover of said immunity. [The criminal corruption by
Indiana judicial system, whether by a mere lower court judge such
as judge Rex
L. Reed,
or by Appellate and Supreme Courts led by chief justice Randall
Terry Shepard, was used as a case in point.] They
commit misconduct “just because they can” do it and get away
with it with impunity. This has resulted in a deeply rooted
criminally corrupt judicial system in every single state of the
United States as well as within its federal judicial system.
Furthermore, it has resulted in the break down of judicial system
and the prevailing judicial tyranny that even the state and
federal legislatures are intimidated into inaction regarding any
remedy to the extent that as far as judicial matters are concerned
at least, legislatures have become impotent and marginalised such
that some of them even decry their
own power and authority expressly given them by their
constitutions and laws (c.f. Indiana House Speaker
Bauer
and
Judiciary Chair
Lawson
deny
the House has the power)
to
impeach a crooked judge. Maybe the legislatures are corrupt too
and/or are too aware that the whole of the judiciary is corrupt
and if they were to impeach any crooked judge, they'd have to
impeach them all. An inevitability that will at some point in time
come to pass. In any case it must be due to either their ignorance
(upon election they swear to uphold the same constitution that
expressly gives the authority to impeach. Do they not know upon
what they swear!?) or having been co-opted in the corrupt culture
of the judiciary. This emasculation of the legislature is also due
to the executive branch being more proactively corrupt as well as
the latter's incestuous and constitutionally prohibited
relationship with the judicial branch to support and provide cover
for each other's corrupt practices. As a notable East-Coast
attorney's signature line motto states,
“The
judicial system is very broken. It must be
fixed.
There
are four people who can do the job:
Everybody,
Somebody,
Anybody,
and Nobody. Everybody thinks Somebody will surely do
it.
It
is a job Anybody can do. But Nobody is doing it. At least I'm
trying.
What
are you doing?”
It
has become evident that not only the judiciary has no intention of
even trying to reform itself, address such concerns and cleaning
its corrupt house, but indeed it is going in the opposite
direction, it has managed to create more cover, whether through
legislation or additional security measures at courts, for its
corruption and misdeeds. Apparently, it believes that it can
continue with business as usual of criminal misconduct and get
away with it. This attitude will only hasten the inevitable
backlash by the public. The legislature too has shown disdain for
the rule of law and the constitution and decided that it will not
even attempt “to do the job” and found that it is more
comfortable to fade into the dustbin of history by denying its own
authority expressly given it by its state and/or federal
constitution and laws that were written in the same House. Hence,
providing no bars for judicial tyranny. The incestuous
relationship between the judiciary and executive branches
has
created a two-way quid pro quo routine whereby the executive
branch would not unleash its investigative power into the judicial
corruption even when the public clamours for one, and the
judiciary provide favourable rulings unduly shielding and
increasing the power of state at the expense of the public and by
curtailing the latter's sovereignty. Hence, sustaining the corrupt
practices of both branches. Even the media have been either
cowered, intimidated and/or co-opted into silence at best, or,
more likely, willing and active participants in the cover up of
same corruption, which seems to be the usual course of
events.
Ultimately,
the job falls upon the ordinary man in the street, i.e. the public
who is the actual and ultimate victim of said judicial corruption
and tyranny, to do. But, unfortunately, ordinary people who are
expressly affected and whose interests dictate (the higher strata
of the society merely buy their way through the legal system in
the USA) that they should pay most attention to forcing the
removal of judicial immunity and fixing the broken and corrupt
judiciary suffer from the same symptoms as the legislature, i.e.
ignorance, lethargy and above all, lack of intestinal fortitude.
The only time, and even then a very small proportion of, the
public gets interested, knowledgeable and involved regarding the
judicial tyranny perpetrated upon it is when they come face to
face (metaphorically, as vast majority of the litigants seeking
redress are unduly and unlawfully blocked
by
the courts from reaching any meaningful or effective stage at
which they could have any hopes of redress, or even before a jury
trial) with
the judicial system in
a legal case at which point they begin to realise the extent of
the erosion of their rights and the stench of irremovable rot set
in the judicial system. By then, alas, it is too late! Given the
hopelessness of the government branches and media in countering
judicial corruption, the only remedy appears to be for groups of
people to stage peaceful civil disobedience
á
la Dr. Martin Luther King and Mohandes Mahatma Gandhi and march on
a daily basis in every state, and for as long as it takes, to the
states supreme courts and the federal supreme court demanding the
rule of law and the Constitution by the judiciary, punishment of
the judiciary and judicial officers against whom there can be
shown proof of misconduct and removal of immunity for any and all
judicial officers for, after all by the federal Constitution, i.e.
the Supreme Law of the Land, no
one should be held above the law, which should apply to all
equally.
Alas, ending judicial tyranny and re-establishing the rule of law
and supremacy of the Constitution require intestinal fortitude
that docile, domesticised and politically correct men (the main
victims of the status quo) no longer possess, even to save their
own families, rights and freedoms. After all, in 1776 the
fundamental rights, now so readily abused and/or deprived by the
judiciary, were obtained by mere smugglers, thieves, slave traders
and tax evaders!
The above
communication
was
additionally sent to State Justice Institute members; National
Center For State Courts
members; State, National and International Judicial &
Legislative Bodies; States, National and International Media, and
The UN Human Rights Commission, et
al.
.
-
01.24.2009: Canada-
“Judge
removes children from mother's control” and sends them “to
U.S. deprogramming centre” for treatment for "alienation"
(Parental
Alienation, PAS) and “abuse”
by
the mother. Globe
And Mail.
The judge's decision can only be described as truly in the best
interest of the children and "child focused and designed very
sensitively to ensure that children emerge from this process as
healthy children". The
"Ontario
judge has ordered that three girls be seized and sent to a
parental alienation centre for deprogramming after their mother
waged an unrelenting campaign to alienate them from their father."
Globe
And
Mail,
or here
(pdf).
"The
children – aged 14, 11 and 9 – were transported several days
ago to the U.S.-based centre. After being treated, they will live
[
:) ] in
the sole custody of their father, a 56-year-old vascular
surgeon."
' “It is now time for his and the children's
fates to be free from [the mother's] control,” Madam Justice
Faye McWatt of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice said in her
ruling. “She has shown that she cannot be entrusted with it.”
'
' The
judge said the children had become so poisoned toward their father
by the mother's “emotional abuse” that they had lost the
capacity to make independent decisions about interacting with
him.'
"Judge
McWatt ordered the 42-year-old mother – a chiropodist identified
only as K.D. – to turn over all the children's clothing,
passports and possessions. K.D. was also ordered not to harass the
children or go within 300 metres of them."
"The judge
also gave the father, A.L., the power to confiscate the children's
cellphones, pagers, computers and BlackBerrys to prevent their
mother from contacting them."
'
“Hopefully, this decision will send a message to other parents
of like mind that, if they alienate children, there is a huge
price that will be paid at the end of it all,” the father's
lawyer, Harold Niman, said in an interview last
night.'
Apparently,
the Ontario courts do not suffer from the corrupting factor of
government monetary incentive kickbacks and profit that influences
U.S. courts into destroying families' and children's lives by
kidnapping the latter and trapping them in the unlawful and
abusive custody of uncaring “mothers” which brings U.S. courts
and state agencies $$$Billions in annual profit. The United States
should be ashamed of itself and its policy of paying courts
incentive to destroy families as a means of social engineering and
control.
We
suggest that Madam Justice McWatt be invited to teach the corrupt
U.S. courts the meaning of “best interest of the child” and
“child focused” decision making!
No
doubt all of us fathers, who under the corrupt U.S. judicial
system have lost our children to courts which prostitute their
judicial integrity for profit and to growing number of psychotic
women who pass themselves off as “mothers” only to control and
abuse our children in conspiracy with the said courts,
congratulate A.L. and his three daughters and wish them the best
in the future living as a healthy family together. We, also most
certainly, look to the day that maybe at long last our own
alienated and abused children (by corrupt U.S. courts and their
"mothers") will return to us recognising and renewing
the bond with their truly caring parents.
- 01.14.2009: The US Supreme Court in an opinion ruled that evidence gathered as a result of errors in a police database is admissible in court. Their narrow decision is wrong, and will only ensure that police databases remain error-filled in the future. It also unlawfully extends the reach of police power enabling them to get away with almost any crime against an individual. Given the corrupt nature of police forces in the US, this decision could have far-reaching consequences for many against whom there are (deliberately?) false and/or invalid records in police databases. Do the 5 justices that voted for this decision even know the damaging consequences of their ignorant and callous action!? It appears that the Roberts' Court has embarked on creating an even more dictatorial Police State.
- 01.13.2009: “Brian Armstrong murdered by jailers” in a New Hampshire “correctional facility” on January 2000. Brian, in temporary custody before appearing in court in a “child support” case, left behind a 12-year old son. The three videos (9:03, 9:51 & 8:46 minutes) present interview of an eye witness, himself a victim of judicial corruption in pursuit of profit under Tile IV-D “child support” fraud by the states. [Should the said video links no longer be accessible, please contact us.] To the present day, federal and New Hampshire state officials have refused to bring criminal charges against the perpetrating jailors!
-
01.05.2009: “Court Delivers
Devastating Blow to Leading Feminist Attorney Barry Goldstein”,
and has “his head handed to him”. “The New York Appellate
Division for the Second Judicial Department imposed a staggering
five-year
suspension
of
Goldstein in
large part for his conduct in the Shockome case. The Court called
numerous statements Goldstein made concerning the Shockome case
"dishonest, false, or misleading." The Court also
criticized Goldstein for misuse of funds in another case he
handled.”
Such
labels usually are attached to crooked professionals. “Goldstein's
fall [and disgrace] is a tremendous embarrassment to many of [the]
opponents in the battle to achieve shared parenting, reform family
law, and protect children's right to a relationship with both
parents after divorce, as well as to those segments of the media
(to wit, Newsweek, Boston Globe) which blindly and/or deceptively
give support to and publicise the destructive feminist agendae.
These include: the New York state chapter of the National
Organization for Women; Justice for Children; The Battered Mothers
Custody Conference; Stop FamilyViolence; The Leadership Council;
and others.
“As
part of their tactics of deception, the feminists, NOW and their
cohorts, deny the existence of Parental
Alienation and fraudulently exaggerate and/or contrive false
abuse claims by men and fathers in order to further their
destructive agendae against the family, children and their
fathers.
It appears that the feminists' and NOW's corrupt
practices and deception tactics extend to even issuing lies,
through such miscreants as Mr. Goldstein, against judges, such as
judge Amodeo in the Shockome case in New York, who do not fall
into the feminist trap of lies. Contrary to one of the many false
statements made by this dishonest attorney, “there was no
evidence that the ex-husband
was an "abuser," and the Court specifically repudiated
this accusation.”
- 01.01.2009: The sham and disgrace of “no-fault divorce” and its fraud upon the families and particularly, the children creating fatherless children and dysfunctional families, and hence society perpetrated by the Elite in their pursuit of world dominance using the ignorance of feminists as their weapon of mass destruction of families. ... And, top ten (10) secrets of it!
-
12.31.2008: “Fathers & Families [a parental equal rights
group] sues
to stop Massachusetts” “child support” guidelines. The new
guidelines, that are expected to come into effect on January 01,
2009, 'were not formulated using the actual costs of raising a
child, as required by federal law, and are thus “arbitrary and
capricious.” The pleadings before the court assert that the
process used to put together the new guidelines violated the due
process and equal protection rights of the payors of child
support, as protected under the United States Constitution.
Additionally, the state bypassed the normal legislative process by
having a secret committee prepare them and a judge declare them to
be law, in violation of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights.'
Such
fraudulent and discriminatory treatment of parents, mainly
fathers, is typical of the state of Massachusetts in its policy of
destroying families and lives of children and their fathers in the
state.
- 12.26.2008: It appears that investigative journalism (an unbiased investigation of truth) is no longer the trade of journalists who sell their souls to the powerful vested interests and advertisers. This is one reason official and judicial corruption has flourished and continues to do so unhindered in America since the so-called members of media have sold out or been intimidated into ignoring the vast evidence and indications of corruption. There was a time that the media could be relied upon to act as a check on the three branches of the government, but now they have well and truly been co-opted into helping cover up or merely look the other way! And yet, people, through buying the media's and journalists' wares, fund the aiding and abetting by the media and journalists in atrocities upon themselves like they fund the atrocities perpetrated by the corrupt judiciary and officials. So, is it any wonder that the oppression of the people by the said perpetrators continues unabated!?
-
12.25.2008: The myth that “the FBI will pursue all allegations
of judicial corruption vigorously,” seems to be further
perpetuated by the special agent John F. Pikus in charge of the
Albany, New York, division. We submit that the investigated of a
case or two does not constitute even the tip of the iceberg of
judicial corruption. Our suggestion is that special agents in
charge in all
divisions
throughout the United States dig into the multitude of complaints
submitted to the FBI which go ignored for variety of reasons to
wit, indifference, refusal to carry out duties (see various
federal statutes that require federal agent to investigate
judicial and official corruption and criminal misconduct),
discrimination, FBI's own misconduct and corruption, deference to
the judicial perpetrators and cronyism. Special
agent Pikus' remarks arise out of his office's investigation
of felony corruption by judge Thomas J. Spargo of East Berne, New
York, in conjunction with the Justice Department's Public
Integrity Section in Washington, D.C. . Our hope and suggestion to
the said special agent from Albany is that he'd strongly
remind
and recommend his colleagues in the state of Indiana of their duty
to act given the multitude of pieces of evidence and complaints on
this website alone showing criminal
and felonious corruption by Indiana judiciary all the way through
the state supreme court and its justices.
The special agent, who evidently is cognizant of his duties and
mandates of his office as well as his moral obligation to act, is
however, correct in one respect, namely “public
corruption violations are among the most serious of all criminal
conduct and can tear at the fabric of a democratic society”.
-
12.22.2008: In a brazen denial of justice, under the pretext of
“economic storm”,
“Justice
is being delayed or disrupted
in state courtrooms across the country [US]“.
This
move, ostensibly implemented under the pretext of financial
pressures, is
a logical and predictable progression in the light of other
constitutional and civil rights denials prevalent in the US and
heralds yet another step toward complete dictatorial government
control [a la “1984”]
through the use of judicial tyranny which has been the hallmark of
American judicial system for many years.
'
"You're talking about erosion of our fundamental civic
fabric," said Ellen J. Shemitz, executive director of the New
Hampshire Assn. for Justice, which represents civil trial
attorneys.' The
system, in the affected states, “will
arraign criminal suspects, process legal motions and otherwise
deal with murders, mayhem and contract disputes. What it won't do
is hold jury trials.” Although judges in the US have long
abandoned taking note of the Constitution and rights thereunder,
the “[c]riminal defendants have a constitutional right to a
speedy trial”, “As a result, civil litigation and family law
cases are bearing the brunt of the disruptions. And cascading
bankruptcies, foreclosures and business disputes have only
increased the backlog.” “At least 19 other states, including
California, have slashed court budgets and other government
services as their economies have tanked, said Daniel Hall, vice
president of the National Center for State Courts, a nonprofit in
Williamsburg, Va.”“All
the effort to subpoena witnesses and prepare for those trials is
right out the window," Reams, a NH county prosecutor said,
adding "Internally, it's a monumental waste of time. We'll
have to redo everything."
“In Vermont, state Supreme
Court Chief Justice Paul L. Reiber recently proposed closing as
many as seven county courts, as well as laying off employees, to
help ease a budget deficit. The state already shuts district and
family courts half a day each week to save money.”
“Robert
J. Lynn, chief justice of the superior courts, which conduct all
New Hampshire jury trials, said he fears the delays inevitably
will cause damage. "There is some element of 'justice
delayed, justice denied,' no doubt about it," he
said.”
'Christopher Keating, executive director of the New
Hampshire Public Defender program, said his chief concern now is
"people in custody who will endure delays in getting their
day in court.” '
-
12.19.2008: “So you believe that free speech is alive and well
in America? Hardly.
Not if you dare to criticize a judge and ESPECIALLY if you’re a
judge who dares to criticize another jurist. In an unprecedented
move that egregiously rapes the First Amendment and effectively
serves to stifle dissent within the judiciary to the public
detriment, the Florida Supreme Court has voted to discipline Judge
Michael Allen of the First District Court of Appeals for
criticizing a fellow judge in a written opinion and in essence,
calling him corrupt.”
This
is the stuff judicial arrogance and corruption, by most american
judges, and cowardice by the rest of them, are made of.
“ In
its 5-0 decision, the court upheld a determination by the Florida
Judicial Qualifications Commission to publicly reprimand Allen
because he had criticized a another judge in a concurring opinion
which was related to an appeal of the bribery conviction for
former Florida Senate President W.D. Childers.”
-
12.17.2008: In a move which is too little and too late for many
families, the UK government opens “to the media” the “Divorce,
custody and care proceedings in court”, in order “to increase
transparency and accountability
in the family courts, the Justice Secretary, Jack Straw, has
announced.”
The
Independent. However, given the manipulation and coercion of the
media by the governments and vested interests, it is expected that
the prevailing bias against fathers and destruction of families by
the courts will persist.
-
12.15.2008: Parents inflicting Parental Alienation Beware!
In
a long overdue ruling a judge
said
'Targets
of Parental Alienation
Can
Sue for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress’. Parental
Alienation
[“PA”]
is a psychological abuse that many parents
(overwhelmingly
“mothers”) inflict upon their children in order to
alienate
the child from the other (“target”) parent and create a rift
between them.
Many
states have laws providing
legal
remedy
for
the target parents to sue the inflicting parents.
Such
an abuse is very often perpetrated with the knowledge and
acquiescence of courts, attorneys, county prosecutors, et al.,
involved in divorce and child custody determination in order to
create discord amongst children and their (often unlawfully
removed) “non-custodial” parents for the purpose of reaping
financial profit
for the courts, judges, counties, prosecutors, attorneys and
states under federal incentive programmes funding such activities
as (whimsically named) “child support” collection, etc. This
deliberately criminal enterprise involving the said perpetrators
results in destruction of lives of the children and their “target”
parents!
-
12.04.2008: In a “call 2 action!” move, the National Congress
for Fathers & Children of New Hampshire (NCFC-NH)
unveiled a new billboard publicising the atrocities the
(whimsically called “family”) courts perpetrate upon children
and their parents, removing fathers from their children's lives
due to the said courts' judicial arrogance, tyranny and ever
pursuit of financial profit
in the form of federal incentives in conspiracy with state
counties, county prosecutors, courts, (equally whimsically named)
“child services” agencies, et al., all of whom share the
unlawfully and ill-gained profits to varying degrees, but,
ultimately, all of whose actions result in the destruction of the
fabric of the society, i.e. the Family. Let
us hope that other parental and civil rights groups emulate the
example of New Hampshire NCFC and bring these atrocities to the
prominence they deserve and urgently need, and that at some point
along the way, the media will regain their conscience and perform
their duties in publicising the said human rights atrocities upon
the children and their families!
-
12.03.2008: “At school,
there's no one like Dad”. A “growing body of ... research
has indicated that students blossom even more when a father jumps
in.” It's amazing that research is required in order for people
in the US to be told what the rest of the (non-Anglo-Saxon) world
already knows regarding necessity and meaning of fathers to their
children and their contributions to the children's lives, and that
fathers are no less valuable and necessary to the well-being of
children than are mothers! The
questions are: why the US society is
so hell bent on destroying families through removing fathers' from
their children's lives, and why the (whimsically named “family”)
courts are so active in conspiring in and facilitating such
destruction! Could it be the deep-seated greed and systematic
corruption of US judicial system and the money destruction of
families generates for them, the states and states' agencies!?
-
12.02.2008: “Lawmakers
call for oversight of Child Services”. “During
the past year, The Indianapolis Star has reported
extensively
on problems within the state agency, including instances when the
agency did not heed warning signs that might have prevented the
deaths of two children.”
No
proposed new laws will stem the death and destruction so brought
upon the families since the ulterior motive for such destruction
will still be in place.
It is the greed and corruption of the judiciary as well as those
of other state agencies that financially benefit
from the incentives paid them by the federal government that will
perpetuate such damage to families. Any
serious and genuine remedy would require disciplining the crooked
judges through impeachment by the
legislature.
(This is the only way to correct the corrupt judicial system since
the Indiana courts, all the way through its Supreme
Court and chief justice Randall Terry Shepard, are riddled
with corruption
and criminal activities (to wit, fraud, conspiracy, case fixing,
falsification of official court records in the perpetrating crime,
child abuse, false imprisonment, threat and intimidation of pro se
litigants and attorneys) and incapable of self-discipline. E.g.
see New York Times article.) But no
Indiana medium has shown the integrity or the courage to publicise
such corruption and crimes even when provided with evidence
thereof! Furthermore, what the Indiana media will not discuss or
report is the very destructive effects on the families and their
lives of the corrupt judiciary and other state and county agencies
such as county governments and prosecutors, child “services”,
etc, all of whom perpetrate their crimes under the aegis of the
crooked courts and together benefit from the blood money incentive
coming from the federal government. Indeed, even when the media,
including Indianapolis Star, are provided with evidence
of such crimes by judges, they encourage such criminal activities
through their silence and not reporting. This makes them every bit
at least as morally responsible as the criminals themselves. Could
their silence be due to fear of and/or having been co-opted into
the judiciary's web of conspiracy or that the longer the judicial
crimes are perpetrated and not reported, the more newspaper copies
are sold reporting the people's and families' destroyed lives and
misery!?
-
12.02.2008: Unlawfully incarcerated father, Clark Rockefeller's
(Christian Karl Gerhartsreiter) concern for his daughter leads to
retrieval of the child's stuffed elephant and doll in time for the
holidays. Mr. Rockefeller had got the presents to give to his
daughter, but through unlawful and corrupt activities of the
Massachusetts, Maryland and US federal authorities, he was not
able to present them to her himself. Mr.
Rockefeller and his 7-year old daughter are victims of the corrupt
US divorce and custody laws whereby, for greed, and
unconstitutionally under the colour of law, the child is almost
always given to the “mother” in order to enable states to
garner federal incentives ($$$Billions) and aid and abet federal
social engineering plans of dismembering families. Such
unconstitutional activities are aided and abetted, either
passively or actively, by the US media. One of the more active and
extreme feminist, sensationalist and politically slanted reporting
of such a story has been by the Boston
Herald in Massachusetts, a haven for extremist feminists and
their political lackeys. Mr. Rockefeller tried
in July 2008 to reclaim his 7-year old daughter who had been
kidnapped under the colour of law and taken to the UK by her
mother distancing the child from her father. Boston Herald's
“reporting” of this unfortunate story is so devoid of
objectivity, professionalism and certainly relevant facts that it
presents itself as a prime example of gutter “press” putting
its extremist politics before the lives of children and their
parents, not to mention sacrificing the truth and objectivity. One
has to only look at the record of such gutter and discredited
“press” regarding their views and reporting of the Family and
corrupt “family” courts, of which those in Massachusetts are a
prime example, destroying families.
- 12.01.2008: “Kafka has a rival. Today, the [British] Foreign Office lectures us on human rights.” “Such an open day beggars belief. At this PR gala you will find no stall for the victims of rapacious British [and, its accomplice in torture and destruction upon others, the US] power”. Nor will there be a stall for numerous instances of torture and assassinations by their own security forces or those of other governments' whose ' “security forces” are trained by the British and Americans and [in some cases] responsible for 90% of torture, [according to] a new study by the British human rights group'. In this Kafkaesque show of hypocrisy, celebrating the 60th anniversary of the UN Declaration of Human Rights this year, the UK and US governments lecture (John Pilger, The Guardian) others on human rights violations while covering up and ignoring their own crimes, tortures and human rights atrocities. For its part, the US additionally celebrates the same by openly instituting torture upon people in concentration camps within its own borders. Ironically, the US's celebration coincides with the second year of its torturing of a British citizen (and no doubt others too) in a Connecticut prison where he has been falsely incarcerated under the colour of law and without his habeas corpus having been considered since 2005. This may not come as a surprise given that the US has been routinely and openly perpetrating torture (Julian Borger, The Guiardian) and other atrocities in concentration camps throughout the world and within its own borders with the acquiescence of its people. It was only a matter of time before such human rights violations would be perpetrated upon its own people. Nevertheless, it is still shocking and unacceptable to the conscience of those whose ideals surpass the daemonic aspirations of one world government and control thereof. It appears that the British government's response to the torture of its citizens by its co-conspirator is at best acquiescence and inaction, or more likely, partnership in crime.
-
12.01.2008: The American Psychological Association (“APA”)
acknowledges Parental Alienation (“PA”) regularly takes place
and that mothers, as the “emotionally
dysfunctional, raging, paranoid, or sullenly depressed“
parent,
are the main perpetrators.
Forensic Psychologist, Deirdre Conway, Rand, Ph.D., writes in
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY, VOLUME 15, NUMBER 3,
1997,
THE SPECTRUM OF PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME (PART
II): “THE
TARGET/ALIENATED PARENT IN PAS
[Parental
Alienation Syndrome]-
Gender
-
Children are about twice as likely to form PAS type
alignments with their mothers as they are
with their fathers
(3, 5, 6, 9). Similarly, fathers are more likely than mothers to
become target
parents”. See
Part I.
Some
fathers “persist in their efforts to establish and maintain a
meaningful post-divorce relationship with their
children
despite daunting obstacles. What motivates these men to persist in
their efforts to father,
despite rejection, calumny and
protracted litigation?
"
Elsewhere in the research, Dr. Conway write: “However,
a significant proportion of high conflict divorce children are
unable to withdraw from
the parental fights and maintain their
stance of rejection and denigration toward the target parent
throughout adolescence."
She
further adds: "Johnston
[a
researcher]
found
that 28 to 43 percent of the 9- to 12-year-olds were in what she
termed "strong
alignments," characterized by
consistent rejection and denigration of the other parent (9).
Children
tended to make stronger alliances with the more emotionally
dysfunctional parent, who
was more likely to be the mother. In
Impasses of Divorce, Johnston described children in strong
alignments as forfeiting their childhood by merging
psychologically with a parent who was
raging, paranoid, or
sullenly depressed (6). Factors within the child which contributed
to the
formation of strong alignments were found to be: 1) need
to protect a parent who was
decompensating, depressed, panicky
or needy; 2) need to avoid the wrath or rejection of a
powerful, dominant parent (often the custodial parent on whom the
child was dependent; and 3)
need to hold onto the parent the
child was most afraid of losing, for example, a parent who was
too self-absorbed or who was only casually involved with the
child."
"CONCLUSION
- Parental
Alienation Syndrome appears to be pervasive.
The [conference] audience response during a recent presentation at
the Second World Congress on Family Law made it clear that PAS is
a social problem in other countries such as Canada and Australia
(58). The probable range of variations in the presentation of PAS
is likely to change according to the opportunities and limitations
of the complex network of people and agencies who become involved.
Outside social systems variously have the capacity to help
ameliorate PAS or to further solidify it. When
alienation becomes complete, it can amount to a de facto
termination of parental rights.
This includes the fact that PAS children experience the loss of
nuclear and extended family, in addition to other long-term,
detrimental effects. The judgments that courts and professionals
make are difficult, complex and have far reaching
consequences."
See
links on the left for more information sources on this subject.
-
11.28.2008: “EVIDENCE
OF CORRUPTION IN THE JUDICIAL NOMINATING COMMISSION”,
“Prosecutor
Lashes Judge”, “Former
Family Court Judge's Allegations of Sexual Misconduct Pop Up”,
“OBSTRUCTION
OF JUSTICE INVESTIGATION”, “FBI
Probes Threats on Federal Witnesses in NY Ethics Scandal”, “NY
Court Clerk Arrested On Filing Fraud”, “Speaking
of Funny Court Filings, 'Pirro Cost Westchester Millions'”,
“Debate
Over Judicial Pay Ignores Widespread Corruption”, “Prosecutor
Says Lawyer's Acts were Brazen Efforts to Corrupt and Subvert the
Legal System”, “Editorial:
Drain the Ethics Cesspool”, “Indicted
NY Justice Winner Now Booked for DWI”, “Wall
Street Journal on Top Prosecutor for Tammany Hall II
Corruption Probe”, “Manhattan
Judicial Candidates Care Little About Laws”, “Confirmed:
NY's Cesspool Court System Drives Everyone to Drink”,
“Pro-Corruption
Federal Judge Stuns Prosecutors”, “Oh,
Good! Another Judge Who Knows Exactly How to Break the Law”,
“Settlement
in Penis Pump Judge Case”, “Lawyer
Reminds Cop He Can Be Bought, Unsuccessfully”, “NY
Chief Judge Story Suggests Continuation of Corruption”,
“More
Insight Into New York's Useless Legal Ethics Groups”,
“Casual
Attitude Toward Court Corruption Now Accepted Culture”,
“Attorney,
without connections, disbarred”, ... For these and other
examples of judicial and official corruption see
exposecorruptcourts.
-
11.28.2008: A British university research study
shows that “Children who spend time with their fathers have a
higher IQ”. The Daily Telegraph, October 01, 2008. “Strong
fatherly involvement in their early life can also improve a
child's future career prospects, the research shows.” This has
implications in terms of both cause and effect. In
terms of cause, the forcible fatherlessness could reduce the IQ
and prospects of vast number of children forcibly estranged from
their fathers by the “mothers” with the connivance of the
states and judicial system in order to reap financial incentives
and profits.
In terms of effect, this dumbing down of the children and populace
would achieve the desired control of them by the federal
government and the states creating a new breed of proles for their
One World Government.
-
11.22.2008: Lyons, New York: John Murtari, a loving father “is
practicing
civil disobedience by personal sacrifice while incarcerated in the
Wayne County jail. He has not eaten or had any water since he was
arrested Monday night for driving without a license. On Friday
Murtari was moved to the medical ward where they could monitor his
health more closely.” During
the past few years John has been, as multitude of fathers are in
the US, dogged by fraudulent claims and periods of incarceration
under the discredited and corrupt US “child support” system
whereby many “mothers” in conspiracy with the courts, county
prosecutors, and other state agencies, lie, commit fraud and false
accusations for profit and incentives. John “claims he doesn't
owe thousands of dollar in child support the State says he owes”.
Unfortunately for John and thousands of other fathers and
children, corrupt state officials and miscreant judges utilise the
judicial tyranny operational in the courts, not the rule of law
and the Constitution. These perpetrators actually directly profit
(and in conflict of interest) from denying fathers and their
children their constitutional rights including but not limited to
their family lives, parent-child relationships (a “highest
liberty interest”- US Supreme Court) and other fundamental
rights. Federal government amorally funds, encourages and feeds
the greed and corruption of such state agencies as social
engineering policy. John having been deprived of family life with
is son, has been petitioning Hillary Rodham Clinton, junior US
senator for his area. She has not only refused to help him, but
also denied him any time to hear his cause, and indeed she has
been the cause of some of John's earlier arrests. Senator
Clinton's refusal to carry out her duty in this case as a US
senator representing her constituents may not be surprising given
her extreme feminist leanings and earlier contributions that have
resulted in the diminution of fathers' parental rights, and
destruction of the Family in the US and elsewhere!
- 11.18.2008: “McALLEN, Texas — A South Texas grand jury has indicted Vice President Dick Cheney and former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales on state charges related to the alleged abuse of prisoners in Willacy County's federal detention centers.” “Cheney's indictment on a charge of engaging in an organized criminal activity criticizes the vice president's investment in the Vanguard Group, which holds interests in the private prison companies running the federal detention centers. It accuses Cheney of a conflict of interest and "at least misdemeanor assaults" on detainees because of his link to the prison companies.” “The indictment accuses Gonzales of using his position while in office to stop an investigation in 2006 into abuses at one of the privately-run prisons.” Could these be the reasons why multitude of innocent people are, as a matter of public policy, hauled into prisons through corrupt courts and with the acquiescence of miscreant judges without due process or any other constitutional protections !?!?!? Could they also be the reason for the US Justice Department, the FBI, and other federal agencies ignoring, in violations of their oaths of office, mandate and stated (even on their web sites!) policies, same corruption and violations by crooked judges and courts and complaint by whistle blowers and victims!?!?!?
-
11.17.2008: “Child
(or agency) Protection?” '
“You
guys do more damage to kids than the parents!” The above
observation uttered by a loving parent is echoed by many. Most
Child Protective Services Supervisors and caseworkers would
consider it malicious slander. As a Child Protective Services
caseworker of eight years, however, I know it to be true. I’m
not alone.'
Rich Rigney, (Child Protective Services, Coos Bay, Oregon), a
case
worker speaks
out.
' Consider
the following irony lamented by Duke Law Professor, Doriane
Lambelet Coleman (2006): “...in the name of saving children from
the harm that their parents and guardians are thought to pose,
states ultimately cause more harm to many children than they ever
help.”
Few in the field argue that Child Protective Services
(“CPS”) nationally has myriad problems that are well
documented in the form of media, research, congressional
sub-committees and expert reports.' ' “However,
the most grievous problem is that those who can most benefit from
this knowledge, those who might use it pragmatically to improve
the lives of children and families - the caseworkers and
supervisors of CPS - appear either ignorant of or indifferent to
the damage that removal of children perpetuates.' [Or, merely
blinded by the $$$ signs that their amoral and fraudulent actions
bring into the coffers of their agencies, courts, county
prosecutors and the state!!!] ' That is: the
most profound problem with “Child Welfare” is that it is not
about the welfare of the child.
Rather,
it is about the welfare of the agency itself.
[I]t
has become undeniable that [.....] the government makes a poor
parent.'
'The tragic wake of this status quo, however, is strewn with the
lives of children and parents. Estimates I’ve come across in my
research reckon that between one-third and two-thirds of those
children currently in foster care nationally should be living with
their parents.' ' In America we must accept freedom’s costs with
its benefits. As Supreme Court Justice ... said, “There is
nothing new in the realization that the Fourth Amendment [illegal
search and seizure] protections come with a price.” This is true
of many other “protections,” such as the right to procreate
and parent.' 'Unfortunately,
Child Welfare is not held accountable for the unattributable
damage to children caused by removal from their families to foster
care.
However, it is well-documented damage.
'
-
11.08.2008: In ever pursuit of amoral and fraudulent federal
incentives
to the tune of $$$100,000,000.00S per year collectively, corrupt
state of of Indiana Department of “Children's Services”
(“DCS”), in conspiracy with the state courts (including its
appellate and supreme courts), county prosecutors and other
agencies, “removes too many kids from homes,” report
says. Indystar. Not only the so-called “child protection”
agencies' main motive is monetary profit, but also they inflict
“more damage to kids than the parents!”.
A view confirmed
and echoed by a brave “child protective” services' case
worker. The Indiana DCS, “a joke”
and subject of ridicule as an agency, has been involved in and
responsible for deaths of some infants recently.
-
11.05.2008: Indiana state Appellate,
Supreme
and Tax Courts judges who were up for re-election were returned
by voters who are unaware of the corruption, case fixing, fraud,
fraud upon the court, conspiracy and other violations (as
evidenced)
by Indiana Supreme, Appellate and lower courts including but not
limited to state chief justice, RANDALL Terry Shepard (“RANDELL
SHEPERD”).
Furthermore, there is no surprise there since they were the only
ones standing for those positions (reminiscent of fascist
one-party system, maybe!)! Also see New York Times article.
Federal
and international actions against these judicial criminal
perpetrators are pending.
- 11.02.2008: In a move that confirms (for example) the grip of judicial coup d'etat and corruption upon the elected institutions at state and federal levels in the United States, Dennis Ross, Chairman of the Florida House of Rep. Committee on Courts refuses to carry out his duty and “hold Judges and the JQC accountable for committing criminal offenses and refusing to investigate them and hold judges accountable to Florida Felony Laws and Protect the US Citizens residing in Florida.”. Background.
-
10.31.2008:
A Brooklyn, NY, 3-year-old
boy abandoned
by his mom dies of “unspeakable beating”, prosecutors said. In
order to collect amoral monetary incentives
(also see above and here)
from the federal government, courts, states and their agencies
such as “Child Protection” Agencies/Administration for
“Children's Services” remove fit fathers from their children's
lives unlawfully and unconstitutionally, and give the children, by
default, to “mothers” who for financial and other reasons try
to sever the bonds between fathers and the children. In the
meantime, as indicated in this report (“Kyle's mom, Eugenia
Holmes, 24, left the
toddler in Cheatham's care ... to move to her father's home in
South Carolina to get her life together,“),
the “mothers” having secured financial profit fail to protect
and raise their children as truly loving and caring parents
should/would. Similarly, it is an indictment of the corrupt “child
protection” agencies (ACS) that, while profiting from the
incentive kickbacks, fail to protect the children affected. In
many cases courts justify their unconstitutional actions in this
regard on the deceptive pretext of “best interest of the child”,
but what they really mean is for the courts' and the system's own
best interest!
-
10.31.2008: “DEAR ZACHARY: A LETTER TO A SON ABOUT HIS FATHER.
True-life
horror“.
“TRIALS
AND TRIBUTE- MEMORIAL
TALE SHIFTS TO LEGAL SAGA”. A documentary film for the unborn
Zachary after his dad, Andrew Bagby, a young doctor, was murdered
by Zachary's pregnant mother.
It depicts the horrors and inequities that fathers and children
suffer in a corrupt society in which judicial corruption and bias
against fathers are rife and used against them and their children
to the point that even murder by “mothers” against fathers are
ignored. (New York Post)
- 10.31.2008: Sheriff's posse is brought into a Bend, Oregon, courthouse to quell and evict protesters objecting to the corrupt judicial system (displayed there by the person of judge Morgan) which is all too prevalent in courts across the US both at state and federal levels. While many americans are unaware of or keep up the pretense that “rule of law” still applies in courts, yet quietly bend to and suffer at the hands of corrupt and miscreant judges, Ms. Wishon and other court watchers were bravely not having any of it. It is long overdue for people to follow the example of Ms. Wishon and insist upon the application of rule of law and the Constitution and demand the clean up of the widespread corruption in courts. (KTVZOR)
-
10.29.2008: In a rare and selective move to discipline corruption
in Indiana courts, the Indiana Commission on Judicial
Qualifications, itself a corrupt and secretive branch of Indiana
Supreme Court, filed
formal charges of judicial misconduct against judge Walter
P. Chapala, a Senior Judge and former Judge of the LaPorte
Superior Court #1, the Commission announced today.
It
appears that the Commission acts to discipline judges very rarely
and only when the said judge “step on the wrong toes”, (e.g.
see the sheriff) and if the complaint is filed by another
“connected” official. This disenfranchises the vast majority
of complaints filed by ordinary citizens and residents. Such
discrimination by the Commission is in violation of the
Constitution's Equal Protection as well as a sign of cronyism and
bias in investigations. The Commission is a semi-secret and
secretive arm of the Indiana Supreme Court and is headed by Chief
justice Randall Terry Shepard against whom there is evidence
of fraud, case fixing, conspiracy and deprivation of rights. Vast
majority of citizens' complaints against judges supported by
evidence have been and are ignored by the Commission.
-
10.28.2008: In playing politics with Indiana families and
children, and further contribution to judicial corruption and
pandering to the fraud perpetrated by the state against parents
and children, Indiana governor, Mitch Daniels, announces
suspension of licenses
of parents who have already been deprived of family life with
their children through corrupt and unconstitutional acts of
Indiana courts.
-
10.28.2008: “US law 'fails
to protect' corporate whistle blowers'.” Financial
Times.
In
further indications of the corrupt US judicial system and culture
of money buying access (or in many cases blocking others from
access) to justice, '
The 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which contained new pro-whistle
blower provisions when it was passed in the wake
of the Enron and WorldCom scandals, “has helped few whistle
blowers actually achieve justice”,
according to the Government Accountability Project, an advocacy
group that provides legal advice to whistle blowers. “Access
to jury trials has proved elusive, and other institutions . . .
have engaged in systematic, hostile activism against the
congressional mandate,”
'.
-
10.27.2008: In the case of judicial corruption in Connecticut
state court and torture by state (through its prison department,
MacDougall-Walker
Correctional
Institute in , CT), USA, against British citizen,lls) Mr. William
Coleman, the American Civil Liberty
Union has issued the following press release
in which it “Condemns DOC Escalation of Inhumane Force-Feeding”,
and appeals
that “U.N. Torture Expert Should Investigate Brutal
Force-Feeding Of Connecticut Inmate”.
The
MacDougall-Walker
Prison
warden is Peter J. Murphy, and deputy wardens are:
Curtis Boyle, Carol Chapdelaine and Edward Maldonald. Another
aspect of Mr. Coleman's case, and the fact that he is still under
a torture regime in the said facility is the corruption of the
state judicial system and break down of rule of law and
constitution in CT state courts through judicial tyranny whereby
consideration of Mr. Coleman's habeas corpus has been
unconstitutionally delayed since
2005
(!)
by “a
three-ring
circus where biased judges co-conspire with state prosecutors and
wimpy public defenders who are unable to land those high paying
jobs in the private sector”.
A habeas corpus, a constitutional right, is supposed to bring
within
48 hours
or
thereabout the body of the accused before a lawful and legitimate
court to determine the lawfulness of the accused's arrest and
incarceration. Mr. Coleman is still waiting for such a
determination. The absence of such habeas corpus hearing thus far
can only be due to judicial corruption and attempts to cover up
the prison's torture of Mr. Coleman, as well as the fact that the
CT state and judicial authorities must be aware that the charges
brought against Mr. Coleman are false and fixed as a result of a
public policy that encourages women to lie and falsely accuse
their partners to gain advantage in divorce and custody cases, not
to mention amorally and fraudulently bringing federal incentive
(tax payers') money to the coffers of the state, courts, county
prosecutors, to the tune of $$$100,000,000.00S per year. Make no
mistakes, this is not just happening to foreigners. These state
perpetrated and judicially sanctioned atrocities are being carried
out against thousands of fathers across the US. The corrupt judges
in the case include a Rockville judge, District
Judge John Nazzaro, and others.
You,
as an advocate of rule of law and constitution in courts are
requested
to
A) show your support of and solidarity with Mr. Coleman by writing
to him (address below). In all
written
correspondence to him, please ensure that his “inmate
number” of 305106 is included after his name and on the
envelope.
And
B) contact the MacDougall-Walker
prison
authorities and demand that they cease and desist from their
torture and force-feeding of Mr. Coleman and that the warden to
immediately produce Mr. Coleman's body before a legitimate court
for consideration of his habeas corpus as required by the US
Constitution.
MacDougall-Walker
Correctional
Institute, 1153
East Street, South Suffield , CT 06080, USA.
Phone:
(860) 627-2100 - MacDougall Building; (860) 292-3400 - Walker
Building; Fax: (860) 627-2144,
E-Mail;
Web.
-
10.24.2008: Police arrests
Donald Tenn, a father and board member of Fathers-4-Justice.
Braidwood, Illinois, is a “small town” in which “One's
constitutional
rights are completely ignored”. “They
completely ignore the law of the land, they have no jury and no
trial, but they do have a mandatory vehicle impound law and fee of
$500 and towing fee of $250,”
Tenn
said, adding that the fees are “extortion,
and a violation of the RICO Act”.
- 10.21.2008: “ Big Brother database threatens to 'break the back of freedom' “. The Independent, UK. Official warns “Government plans to build a giant database holding information about every phone call, email and internet visit” as those of a "Big Brother" security state.
-
10.20.2008: Excellence in Information
Integrity (EII) prizes were awarded
today by Information
Integrity Coalition (IIC) Recognizing Organizations for
their “Achievements in Improving Information Accuracy,
Consistency and Reliability”. Indiana
Supreme Court (IN-SC) was appropriately not one of the (Gold,
Silver, Bronze) winners.
Prior
to today's ceremony, immediately upon learning that IN-SC had been
selected as one of the 12 finalists, Dr. Sanjari and other
advocates of cleaning up Indiana's judicial corruption began
lobbying the IIC not to choose IN-SC as a winner due to the
deliberately fraudulent and falsified information and records
IN-SC creates and maintains
to
cover up its
own corruption and criminal activities and those of Indiana's
lower court judges.
Hence, disqualifying IN-SC from winning a prize not only for its
own criminal misdeeds, but also for lack of integrity, accuracy
and reliability of its information and records and misrepresenting
same in order to qualify for the competition.
In support of
their lobbying, Dr. Sanjari, et al., provided information and
proof
of IN-SC's criminal activities and fraudulent records to the IIC
board members, staff and the award's other US and international
candidates.
-
10.20.2008: “Women
are just as likely as men to engage in partner aggression.”
'
[A] psychologist reviewed
hundreds of studies and concluded, “Women were slightly more
likely than men to use one or more act of physical aggression and
to use such acts more frequently.”
' This debunks the myth, propagated through biased and erroneous
studies to the contrary.
-
10.20.2008:
“Dead
fathers will be chased for maintenance cash”. In
further unabashedly criminal and disgraceful pursuit of New World
Order through the destruction of the Family, primarily by the US
and UK governments, “[a]bsent fathers will be pursued beyond the
grave for maintenance payments by” a “system [that already]
degrades and demeans fathers, [and] treats them as cash machines
and now it will do so even when they're six feet under.”,
said Matt O'Connor, a founding member of the Fathers4Justice
campaign group.
"There
have already been people who were driven to their graves by the
CSA [the
“failed”
“Child Support” Agency]–
fathers
who have committed suicide
often because they were struggling to look after second families
and couldn't cope with the demands from the CSA.”
Further adding, "It won't be fathers who pay, it will be
their children and families." Telegraph.co.uk.
What
price the New World Order pursued by the US and UK governments in
using children and their “mothers” to destroy families!?
-
10.20.2008: The hypocrisy of judicial corruption in Indiana where
judges think they are, along with their superiors (Indiana Supreme
Court),
above the law. If Israel Nunez Cruz,
Commissioner in the Marion Superior Court, and
John
F. Hanley,
Judge of the Marion Superior Court, were ordinary people, they'd
have been incarcerated for a significant time!
Furthermore,
when it comes to even more serious crimes by judges, Indiana
Supreme Court chips in to cover up those crimes by judges against
the People of Indiana.
-
10.19.2008: It has been called “a waste of taxpayer money”.
But, if an ordinary person, other than a judge, had helped
themselves to the unconstitutional
and unlawful helpings of $10,000.00s each annually, it would have
been called fraud
and
the person jailed. In
a case brought by Judicial
Watch, a California Appeals Court ruled unconstitutional the
“perks and supplemental benefits” judges had been helping
themselves to over years. Such is the widespread corruption,
greed, fraud, abuse of power and double standards amongst the
judiciary and within the judicial system.
-
10.18.2008:
A
Bill and Petition for Impeachment of one judge Olga H. Stickel
of Elkhart Superior Court No. 4 (Elkhart, Indiana), has been filed
to the Indiana House for her criminal acts and conspiracy with
Elkhart county deputy prosecutor (Bruce
Wells)
and other state and county actors.
Previously,
impeachments
against judge Stickel's “brethren” judges Roberts
(Superior Court # 1) and Bonfiglio
(Superior Court # 6) had been filed to the Indiana House.
Similarly,
arising from another Elkhart court case a Petition for Impeachment
of judge Rex L. Reed
(pictured here) had been filed by Dr. Sanjari. Criminal corruption
by Elkhart county officers (of CPS, etc), prosecutor (Curtis T.
Hill, Jr.) and his deputy (Bruce A. Wells), courts and judges
thereof is rife and knowingly an deliberately covered up by
Indiana Appellate and Supreme Courts judges. Offices of all these
state actors financially profit from their decisions to commit
crimes and deprivation of rights against parents, particularly
fathers in their kangaroo “family” courts.
-
10.18.2008: In what amounts to torture, Osborn and
MacDougall-Walker prisons in Connecticut “force-feeds”
Mr. William Coleman, a British (an ex-Waterbury) man who went on
hunger strike. Furthermore, “State officials prohibit media
interviews about his protest, ... hunger strike or his life”.
Republican
American.
The
force-feeding comes on the heels of various types of tortures
carried out in US concentration camps as well as in many of its
prisons that have come to light over the past several years, and
according to the American Civil Liberties Union that “is
defending [Mr. Coleman's]
right
to engage in a hunger strike”, “violates his constitutional
right of free speech and his right to refuse medical care”. [See
the Constitution a “dead
letter”.] The US and its states' officials have consistency
tried to cover up their use of torture and atrocities upon their
own and other citizens.
“Mr.
Coleman
is protesting his 2005 conviction in Waterbury Superior Court for
sexually assaulting his wife and a justice system he says is
easily manipulated by spouses making accusations in the midst of
custody and divorce disputes.” The small number of reports
presented on this site bears witness to and confirm Mr. Coleman's
assertions that the US judicial system is deeply corrupt and
manipulated by women, the courts, county prosecutors, attorneys
and officials of all 50 states motivated by the monetary incentive
offered by the federal government. The US is knowingly and
systematically conducting a campaign of removing fathers from the
family and criminalising them.
-
10.18.2008: A 33-year old “mother” faces a felony identity
theft charge after enrolling in a Wisconsin high
school
as her 15 year old daughter.
Wendy
Brown has pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity to the
charge that she stole her daughter's identity to join a school's
cheerleading squad.
Could
such vanity and warped-mindedness be the reason for many “mothers”
alienating their children from their fathers?
-
10.15.2008: The corrupt Elkhart Superior Courts (Elkhart,
Indiana),
in
conspiracy with and through one judge Olga H. Stickel (Elkhart
County, No. 4 ),
have vindictively retaliated against a father who blew the whistle
on their corruption by filing, amongst other things, an
impeachment against judge Stickel's
“brethren” judges Roberts
(Superior Court # 1) and Bonfiglio
(Superior Court # 6). This
vindictive conspiracy by Elkhart judges has resulted in the
father, Mr. Stephens, being incarcerated under contrived and
fraudulent pretext to further the Elkhart county and state of
Indiana's criminal acts and defrauding of parents and citizens
perpetrated by the said county's judges, prosecutor (Curtis T.
Hill, Jr. ) and his deputy (Bruce Wells).
Earlier
impeachment had also been filed
against a judge Rex
L. Reed
(pictured
here) on another Elkhart case. Judges Roberts
and
Stickel
are
running for re-election this November 4, 2008. Elkhart,
IN, voters
may
wish to think carefully about voting to return these two judges to
the Bench for, YOUR family and children may well be next for these
Elkhart judges to destroy, defraud and abuse.
-
10.13.2008: In a continuation of the conspiracy and fraud
perpetrated by the US federal government, its 50 states
governments and a growing number of “mothers” against fathers
and their children through Title
IV-D scam, yet another (Oklahoma) man
has been put through the “worst” years of his life just so
that the perpetrating crooks would get money from him under the
fraudulent pretext of “child support” under Title
IV-D. More
disturbingly, the victim (the man) is not even the father of the
child for whom he is supposed to pay. But indications are that
even 0.0% probability of paternity does not make any difference to
the perpetrators who destroy families for greed and in order to
achieve their New World Order of fatherless children!?
-
10.08.2008: Subversion of the rule of law and the constitution by
Indiana House of Representatives and surrendering its authority
and sovereignty of people to judicial tyranny.
In further
erosion and subversion of Indiana and United States constitutions
and laws, Indiana House of Representatives Speaker, B. Patrick
Bauer [South Bend, IN] (via his chief of staff, Patrick
Cunningham) purportedly speaking on behalf of the whole House, and
Judiciary Committee's Chair, Linda Lawson [Hammond and Munster,
IN] fearfully cave in to and/or allow themselves to be co-opted by
the judicial tyranny and corruption
of Indiana judges.
Listen to the conversations (audio
Bauer
, Lawson)
with their offices in which they explicitly deny their
responsibilities and the power
and authority granted to the House by Indiana constitution
(Art. 6 & 7) and laws (IC 5-8-1, et seq.) to, upon petition,
investigate and file (with the Indiana Senate) Articles of
Impeachment against judges who commit crimes and corruption.
By
espousing such a position they betray the sovereignty of citizens
of Indiana who have put their trust in their representatives in
the Indiana legislature. Not only these Representatives are
abdicating their constitutional and legal responsibilities, but
also Speaker Bauer claims that the said unlawful and subversive
position is that of ALL of the Indiana House, hence rendering and
co-opting ALL other 99 of the House Representatives into the web
of fear of, and/or conspiracy with, the judicial branch's tyranny.
In the process, the said two legislators, and any other legislator
who erroneously agrees with them, are surrendering the powers of
the legislature to the judicial
tyranny presided over and covered up by chief
justice Randall Terry Shepard (who is standing for re-election
as chief justice of Indiana and against whom there is evidence of
conspiracy and cover up of fraud upon the court, fraud,
constitutional deprivations, criminal activities, etc, by state
judges such as judge Rex
L. Reed
(pictured
here) of Kosciusko circuit Court, judge David C. Bonfiglio,
some other judges of Elkhart Superior and Circuit Courts, some
attorneys, et al.).
Representatives Bauer
and Lawson
refuse to act on impeachment petition on the pretext of advice by
their attorneys who, apparently, have us believe the Indiana House
does “not have jurisdiction” to impeach judges. This position
violates Articles 6 & 7 of Indiana constitution and Indiana
laws, IC 5-8-1, et seq.. The said two Representatives' position,
which constitutes violation of the Indiana laws and constitution,
deception of people of Indiana and abdication of their own
responsibilities, is espoused on the advice of their attorneys
who, as Indiana BAR members are beholden to the Indiana Supreme
Court, and therefore, their advice is not only on the basis of
conflict of interest, but it is erroneous, self-serving and
treasonous not to mention lending itself to the conspiracy to
deprive rights and cover up other crimes.
To serve as a member
of the legislature, one would have to pledge allegiance to and
swear to uphold the Indiana and United States constitutions. This,
the above two representatives apparently have done. Yet, they do
not seem to know the Indiana constitution (e.g. Articles 6 &
7), nor care for it since they willingly have surrendered,
ostensibly through their attorneys, to the will of judicial
tyrants and violation of their own oaths of office!
Question
to other 98 members of the Indiana House of Representatives:
Is the said unlawful position (regarding the House's jurisdiction
and duty to impeach a judge) also espoused by you?
If not, are
you going to allow yourself to be co-opted into this conspiracy to
subvert Indiana laws and constitution and its citizens'
sovereignty and surrender your legislative powers to the judicial
tyranny?
Can Indiana citizens, specifically those in districts
of South Bend and Hammond, have any confidence in their
legislators to up hold and protect the laws they have formulated
and ensure that they are applied even by judges? And of the latter
defies the law and the constitution, are the legislators to be
trusted to ensure the integrity of the Indiana laws and that of
the House by impeaching corrupt and miscreant judges?
Question
to Indiana Citizens:
Are
you going to re-elect the same individuals to the Indiana
legislature when they willingly surrender its authority to
judicial tyranny and crooked judges either out of fear of said
judges or in conspiracy with them? Or, are you going to demand
that the said Representatives to uphold your rights under the
constitution and laws of Indiana and utilize their authority to
impeach crooked judges who violate the same laws and constitution
every day they sit on the bench resulting in the destruction of
your families, fundamental rights, livelihoods, and even lives?
-
10.07.2008: Petitions for Impeachment* of judges Evan
S. Roberts and David
C. Bonfiglio
of
Elkhart Superior Courts, Elkhart, Indiana, for their pervasive
criminal misconduct, have been filed in accordance
with
the Indiana and United States constitutions and laws with
the offices of the Chairman** of the Judiciary Committee and The
Speaker*** of Indiana House of Representatives with copies sent to
other Indiana legislators.
*
See Projects (“What You Can Do”) below.
** Linda Lawson,
House Judiciary Chair, Rep., District 1, Hammond & Munster,
IN, h1@in.gov .
*** B. Patrick
Bauer, House Speaker, Rep., District 6, South Bend, IN, h6@in.gov
.
- 09.29.2008: An open letter by the Ofume Family to Duval Patrick, Governor of State of Massachusetts regarding the conspiracy and violations of human rights and the Rome Convention on Crimes Against Humanity by President George W. Bush and Mitt Romney, former governor of Massachusetts and the role of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts thereupon. Philadelphia Independent Media Center.
-
08.21.2008: “Parents face a sinister threat, which is
controlled, funded and supported by every state child welfare
agency. Child Protective Service (CPS) agencies abuse their
federally endorsed authority to destroy the lives of close to
1,000 children each and every day of the year.” “Just
Who's Abusing Whom?” “This
is an industry, which has grown by huge proportions and must be
reined in. The Gestapo type tactics currently being used by state
agencies, to increase revenue from federal sources may provide
jobs today for the local economy but is having a negative impact
on many levels.”
-
08.19.2008: Barnstable (Massachusetts) Juvenile Court judge Carol
Smith is said in affidavits relating to the DSS Care and
Protection cases to have committed multiple “violation[s]
of
judicial canons, misconduct and violation of [her]
oath
to uphold the laws and the Constitution”, including “allowing
perjury” and due process violations, and more. The judge is
under investigation by the Massachusetts Commission on Judicial
Conduct. Article
by Nev Moore, Massachusetts News.
“The Commission is
interested in hearing testimony from anyone who has experienced
similar problems in Barnstable Juvenile Court Care and Protection
proceedings as their concern is the possibility of a consistent
pattern of misconduct. Their number is (617) 725-8050, and all
communications are strictly confidential.”
“The most
damaging issue is the secret filing of false documents to receive
federal funding.” This fraudulent
and unlawful act is
understood
to be a common
practice
in
many, if not all states of the Union, in DSS, CPS and “child
support” cases by judges and various state agencies in order to
maximize the federal incentive they receive for destroying
families.
It
is hoped, expected and demanded that such prevalent unlawful
(mis)conduct by judges will not be brushed under the carpet and
will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and
Constitution.
-
08.19.2008: Rebecca Walker, daughter of the “rabid” American
feminist Alice Walker, and goddaughter another American feminist
Gloria Steinem, 'writes that she nearly missed out on being a
mother "thanks to being brought up by a rabid feminist
[mother]
who
thought motherhood was about the worst thing that could happen to
a woman." ' Article
By
Hilary White, LifeSiteNews, July 30, 2008.
'It
was the love of her little son and her joy at being a mother that
rescued Rebecca Walker from the unhappiness of life as the
neglected daughter of a feminist icon.'
-
08.16.2008: “Congress Tags Child Support as Luxury Income;
Collection System an Economic Failure”,
Article
by Roger F. Gay, mensnewsdaily.
In
a move to further confirm the federal government's complicity in
destroying families and children's and their fathers' lives and
rights, and to further show that its interference in the family is
for nothing other than greed and social engineering, the Congress
has chosen to ignore the real problems with the system and instead
is, yet again, charging families money to further perpetrate the
government''s atrocities under the pretense of children's
interest.
- 08.16.2008: “Marriage- When will men learn? “, Article in Current, http://familycourtmafia.blogspot.com . “With 3 out of 4 marriages ending in divorce and 83 percent of custody cases going to females, it is no wonder that there is a lack of willingness and feeling of despair amongst men when it comes to participating in raising their children. Most men report that they are met with fierce resistance and obstacles by not only the mother but also that of the court system that generally has little compassion or willingness to assist in their desires and wishes to remain a force in the lives of their children. 46 responses Anger over girls' strip... “
-
08.16.2008: Interview:
Matt O'Conner, Founder of Fathers 4 Justice (“F4J”), by Ian
Dunt, Politics.co.uk.
In
this interview, which comes on the heels (Friday, the previous
day) of another “Superman” father disrupting the busiest
highway in the UK protesting draconian laws and treatment of
fathers, Mr. O'Conner repeated his and F4J's (UK) support for
direct action to bring attention the atrocities perpetrated upon
children and their fathers by the government and divorce
industry.
Alas, the fathers in the US do not seem to have the
courage of their convictions to follow suit.
-
08.14.2008: In its continuing efforts
and conspiracy to further subvert the rule of law and solidify
judicial tyranny in the US, “[t]]he [American
Bar Association]
ABA
Plots a Judicial Coup ” in
“the
latest lawyer-led attempt to strip judicial selection from future
Presidents.”, Article,
Wall Street Journal, Page A12.
”Some
bad ideas never seem to die, especially in the hands of a crafty
attorney.” “What
we have here is According to the proposal, future federal judges
would be selected not by an elected President, but with the aid of
home-state Senators and a bipartisan commission [overwhelmingly,
if not completely consisting of lawyers and ABA members]
that
would provide a list of recommended nominees for judicial
vacancies. The White House would then select a candidate from the
preapproved list.”
In
their “coup”, the ABA has “also
enlisted
former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor [a former US
Supreme Court judge and a defender of miscreant judges and current
corrupt judicial system, and a critic of judicial accountability]
to push for an expansion of merit selection
at
the state level as an alternative to judicial elections --
which the bar loathes because voters can be so darn
unpredictable.”
Earlier
in 2007, ABA attempted to remove “appearance of impropriety”
as a basis for disciplinary action against judges committing
misconduct. ABA's continuing attempt and conspiracy to further
pervert the course of justice and rule of law by judges must be
taken seriously and urgently countered since it is taking the US
judicial system into an ever darker and irreversible depth of
judicial tyranny and corruption, no doubt as part of the
prevailing plans to impose tighter control of the population
through the said judicial corruption and tyranny.
There
goes another plank of the US Constitution for, it is now but a
dead-letter!
-
08.13.2008: Parental Alienation and its destruction of children
re-visited. Cable TV airs “intervention” showing the real life
destructive effects of Parental Alienation depicting the downward
spiral of a young 21-year old woman, who was addicted to Crystal
Meth and alcohol and was in danger of dying or killing someone
else, as a result of suffering from Parental Alienation inflicted
by her mother while growing up. The
young woman who had so much potential and hope would turn
literally into a wild animal whose sole purpose was to get high
and stay high. When the family convened and tried to plan for the
intervention to bring her back from the brink, it was acknowledged
that the biggest factor for this young woman becoming an addict in
the first place was the parents' divorce and furthermore the
alienation that took place afterward at the hands of her mother.
The mother admitted to, then, making the situation worse by
limiting contact between the child and her father that the young
woman, then a 9-year old girl, loved. Their would be little
contact with the father and very few parenting times due to the
alienation that was purposely being waged upon the girl against
her father.
As the mother sat in tears recalling her role in
the downfall of their daughter, there was no anger from the father
or anyone else, only regret at what they had done to this girl.
The girl, now a young woman, is a stripper who regularly spends
her day getting high and sleeping in filth and garbage and shows
little hope of turning her life around. The young woman agrees to
go into rehabilitation which she gets thrown out of and then is
given a choice again - either straighten up or go to jail. The
girl who has over 13 years of suppressed emotions and pain
stemming from her parents' divorce and forced separation from her
dad, would rather do anything than face her feelings and address
her issues. You can repeatedly hear the hate and anger she throws
at her mother over what happened long ago. The mother just sits
there and cries not knowing what to do. The father is at a loss as
to how to handle things because he was given his daughter back at
18 when she was a full blown addict because the mother could not
handle her anymore. (And very possibly also because the father was
no longer legally responsible for child support because she was
working. I wish that I could say that this story has a happy
ending but it doesn't. The girl chooses jail over therapy. The
very thought of dealing with feelings involving her family is too
much for her to handle. After completing her jail time, she was
back to getting high in 4 weeks. The sad part is that this story
is being repeated every day in courthouses and homes all across
the US and the pain, agony and destruction perpetrated upon the
children by the very people and institutions (i.e. the courts,
judges, CPS, local and federal governments) that are supposed to
protect the innocent, instead they use children and their willing
mothers as tools to satisfy and feed their greed and lust for
control over the young and the population as a whole with the aim
of their “New World Order”. The choices that we make now are
going to come back to haunt us.”
-
08.13.2008: “Alienating Mom Denies Dying Man Chance to See
Child”, By
Glenn Sacks, American
Chronicle.
“A dying man has been told by the Family Court
that he may leave a "time capsule", consisting of a
letter and DVD, for the 11-year-old daughter he has not seen for
five years.” “Tragically,
feminist groups such as the National Organization for Women serve
as enablers for alienating parents by denying that Parental
Alienation [“PA”]
exists”.
“This
case has many of the hallmarks of a classic PA case.” “I get
countless letters detailing the horrors that alienating parents
visit upon their exes and their children, but this story surprised
even me.” In such cases “the alienating parent
[mostly
the mother]
will
raise heaven and earth to prevent the targeted parent
[mostly
the father]
from
having a relationship with the alienated child.
Here
the father is dying and the mother claims she doesn't believe it,
and refuses to allow him to see his daughter.” “The daughter
has no doubt been told that her father abandoned her.”
Alienated
children are typically indoctrinated into denying existence of PA
through feminists' and alienating mothers' lies that PA is “just
an excuse by fathers to shirk from their parental
responsibilities”.
This
results in delayed or total absence of appropriate treatment of
the alienated child.
Glen
Sacks write frequently on Parental Alienation. See Archive
for the 'Parental Alienation/PAS' Category including articles and
interviews by alienated children, and also his article.
Parental
Alienation and deprivation of father-child relationship through
corrupt “family” courts are elements of the corrupt scandal of
the western, primarily Anglo-Saxon societies as part of their move
toward the “new World Order” and elimination of fathers' roles
and enslavement of the people.
-
08.13.2008: “Speaking of Crime: The Language of Criminal
Justice”, A
Useful Book
, especially for the Pro
Se,
by Lawrence M. Solan & Peter M. Tiersma.
It presents
some of the vagaries of the law and judicial discrimination and
deprivation of individual's rights by judges. E.g., that:
'
The courts appear to accept compliance to indirect speech (e.g.,
"Have you a way of opening the trunk from there?") as
consensual agreement [to a search]. Yet when it comes to civilians
invoking the right to the presence of a lawyer through their use
of indirect language (e.g., "Maybe I should think of
contacting an attorney . . ."), the courts will typically not
accept this as an equivocal request for an attorney to be present
nor deem it a call for the cessation of further questioning.'
-
08.13.2008: "Files Show Governor Intervened With Court",
by filing an Amicus Curiae with the Court, asking for a review of
the case which benefited Du Pont.
”Gov.
Manchin a 'puppet' of DuPont's, attorney says”,
by
John O'Brien -Statehouse Bureau, West
Virginia Record.
“Industrial
giant DuPont used Gov. Joe Manchin's office to skirt limitations
concerning its appeal of a $382 million jury verdict, attorneys
who sued the company said Wednesday.” ' "It's unforgivable
that this governor would side with a corporation, with DuPont,
without understanding the intricacies," said Papantonio, who
represented the nearly 8,000 plaintiffs who lived in or around
Spelter and alleged that DuPont dumped arsenic, cadmium and lead
at a nearby plant.' “Manchin filed his brief June 24, and
records show that he had met with a DuPont official and attorney
three weeks earlier. Also, “he spoke on the phone in Nov. 2007,
less than a month after the Harrison County Circuit Court verdict,
with DuPont's chief executive, the New York Times reported.”
Is
there any wonder that multitude of people, especially individuals
and pro
ses,
do not receive legal redress and rule of law, much less justice,
in courts in this country!
-
08.13.2008: D.C. Festival 2008 (August 15 & 16) for Equal
Protection Under the Law, Family Preservation and Preservation of
Rights of Children to Equal Life and
Time With Both of Their (separated / divorced) Parents. For
information to get involved and go there, contact DC
Festival 2008 (toll-free at 800-883-9619), or F4J.
-
08.13.2008: “Police Turn to Secret Weapon: GPS Device” ,
Article
By
Ben Hubbard, Washington Post, Page A01.
'Across
the country [US], police are using GPS devices to snare thieves,
drug dealers, sexual predators and killers,
often
without a warrant or court order.
Privacy
advocates said
tracking
suspects electronically constitutes illegal search and seizure,
violating Fourth Amendment rights of protection against
unreasonable searches and seizures, and is another step toward
George Orwell's Big Brother society
[“1984”].
Law
enforcement officials, when they discuss the issue at all, said
GPS is essentially the same as having an officer trail someone,
just cheaper and more accurate.' ' "We don't really want to
give any info on how we use it as an investigative tool to help
the bad guys," said [...]
a
Fairfax [VA]
police
spokeswoman.
These
days, with the rampant and officially sanctioned unlawful and
unconstitutional violations by state and federal agencies, it is
not clear who the “bad
guys”
are
anymore, those in the uniform and/or black suits, or the members
of public!
P.S. If anyone is naive or unaware enough to dismiss
such concerns as “paranoia”, “conspiracy theory”, etc,
then they should just look into the laws, tools and technologies
started under innocuous pretexts and then utilised by the
government (e.g. see “RFID” in clothing, 08.13.2008, in this
section) to deprive people's liberties, rights and privacy!
-
08.13.2008: Is Big Brother going to identify and track your
movements everywhere through your clothes,
shoes, and other apparel using RFID (Radio Frequency
IDentification technologies?
'Dr.
Katherine Albrecht, the Harvard-educated privacy campaigner
featured in the film "Freedom to Fascism" and co-author
of the bestselling book "Spychips,"
will be on-hand to speak to attendees [of ]
["RFID
in Fashion" conference]
arriving
for the opening keynote this
afternoon at NYC's Fashion
Institute of Technology.' Dr. 'Albrecht planned today's protest
after discovering the conference would promote the use of RFID in
individual clothing items. Known as "item-level tagging,"
the practice of placing RFID tags on consumer items
(rather
than on crates or pallets in a warehouse) has been widely
condemned by privacy and security experts. Experts caution that
such tags pose
huge privacy and safety risks to the public.
Used to track inventory in warehouses, RFID tags can easily be
used to track people as well – a fact that can be exploited by
marketers, government agencies, and criminals. IBM, for example,
has patented RFID "person tracking units" for placement
in walls and floors to allow marketers and government agents to
secretly monitor people's movements. They suggest using the
devices in public spaces like shopping malls, theaters, elevators,
and restrooms once RFID is implemented at the item level.' Review
this and other related articles such as Microchip-Induced
Tumors in Laboratory Rodents and Dogs: A Review of the Literature
1990–2006 by Dr. Albrecht, et
al..
P.S.
If anyone is naive or unaware enough to dismiss such concerns as
“paranoia”, “conspiracy theory”, etc, then they should
just look into the laws, tools and technologies started under
innocuous pretexts and then utilised by the government (e.g. see
“Police Turn to Secret Weapon: GPS Device”, 08.13.2008, in
this section) to deprive people's liberties, rights and privacy!
-
08.12.2008: Video
and information regarding some of the many forms of gender
discrimination against men and fathers including, but not limited
to,
The
Anti-Father Police State, Paternity
Fraud, False
Accusations, Criminal
Bias, Men's
Health, Gender
Bias Regarding Domestic Violence, The
Selective Service: Discrimination. Tyranny and Genocide Against
Males, Education,
Wage Gap, ... .
The
purpose? In preparation for the New World Order” maybe?!
-
08.12.2008: Little Rock, Arkansas- 'A [courageous]
state
police investigator [Special
Agent Rick Newton]
...
appeared before a legislative committee, held his badge in the air
and put the director of the Children Family Services Division on
notice that he is conducting a criminal investigation into the
deaths of four foster children. 'After
the meeting, Department of Human Services Director John Selig
contacted the governor’s office.' 'Selig declined to discuss
that conversation.'
Afterwards,
the courageous 'state police investigator drew [negative?]
attention
Monday from his supervisors and the governor’s office'! Article
By Amy Upshaw, Arkansas Online®.
No
wonder that investigations and law suits against miscreant CFSD,
CPS, judges Human Services and other corrupt state employees do
not get anywhere and victims do not get any redress! Listen for
that phone call on the CFSD employee or the “brethren”
judge
to hush up and cover up their corruption. Conspiracy of silence
(at best) or active muzzling and retaliation by the system abounds
in US courts and state and federal “family” agencies. There
needs to be
more
such
courageous
officers to expose and investigate the corruption in such state
and federal agencies.
-
08.12.2008: “Electronic cuffs planned for dads ”, “I don't
see any safeguards. This presumes men guilty”. Article
WorldNetDaily.
In
a move confirming that the US has already become a police state (a
la “1984”
by
George
Orwell, [The US state of] ' Illinois
has joined a growing contingent of states [Washington,
Utah, Minnesota, Colorado, Michigan, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Florida
and Massachusetts] to
adopt a law
[that]
“carries
a presumption of guilt”, “without the benefit of a trial”
[and],
that
will put electronic GPS tracking bracelets on men who have not
been convicted of any crime, but might be involved in a messy
divorce.' '
A
recent article by two leaders of the State Bar of California's
Family Law Section said such
orders
"are increasingly being used in family law cases to help one
side [almost
always by women]
jockey
for an advantage in child custody.”
And
the Illinois Bar Journal has described them as part of the
"gamesmanship"
of divorce.' But,
'
the full impact of Illinois' new law is that judges can order
anyone – mostly men and fathers – to wear a GPS tracking
device if they simply are accused of violating an order of
protection, with no court conviction or adjudication required.'
Fathers
rights '
organization[s] will work with lawmakers to make them aware of the
potential pitfalls of their new law and will watch cases as they
develop to pursue a court challenge to its
constitutionality.'
Such
unconstitutional laws including those unconstitutionally and
fraudulently removing fathers from their children's lives are used
by corrupt courts to harness federal incentive money for judges,
counties and states as well as furthering the goal of the US
federal government in controlling the population in its move
toward the “New World Order”.
- 08.12.2008: This video discusses the “real” purpose behind creation of the European Union (“EU”)- En route to the “New World Order” ?!
-
08.12.2008: Parental Alienation and other bullying by
“mothers”.
“Anyone
concerned about the use of torture at Guantanamo Bay ought to be
protesting these use of torture in American [whimsically
named “family”]
courtrooms”,
by
John Maguire, Mens
News Daily.
“In several books [...], certain feminist
writers have identified and painted a full picture of the way
girls between ten and 14 bully each other though exclusion,
back-biting, and other ways to destroy the victim’s relationship
with her friends.” This, in later life, is exhibited through
mothers inflicting parental alienation upon their children and
against the children's fathers. 'Among the key books on relational
aggression are Odd Girl Out, by Rachel Simmons, and Queen Bees and
Wannabees by Rosalind Wiseman. To quote Simmons:
“There is a
hidden culture of girls’ aggression in which bullying is
epidemic, distinctive, and destructive. It is not marked by direct
physical and verbal behavior that is primarily the province of
boys. Our culture refuses girls access to open conflict, and it
forces their aggression into nonphysical, indirect and covert
forms. Girls use backbiting, exclusion, rumors, name-calling, and
manipulation to inflict psychological pain [e.g. Parental
alienation] on targeted victims. Within the hidden culture of
aggression, girls fight with body language and relationships
instead of fists and knives. ” '
-
08.12.2008: Dallas, TX- “Dad wins custody of abused girl.”,
Article
By
JON NIELSEN / The Dallas Morning News.
A
court gives the children to Father instead of sending them back to
abusive Mom or (gasp) Child Protective Services!
This
is a start.
Someday,
we will read news that such abusive mothers are punished for their
actions. And, someday, we will read news that each
parent,irrespective gender, should they desire it and barring any
evidence of abuse, will receive equal custody of each child of
divorce.
-
08.12.2008: Connecticut- “State Legislators Plan Investigation
Of DCF”,
- By JON LENDER, Courant.
“Angered
by problems such as rising costs and the use of potentially
dangerous restraints at the state's psychiatric hospital for
children, legislators are planning an investigation into the
performance of the Department of Children and Families.”
There
should be investigation into all DCF / CPS branches in all states
for their use and abuse of children and families to satisfy their
greed and federal incentive money.
-
08.10.2008: The National Organization of Women (“NOW”), a
feminist group with extreme anti-man and anti-father ideology,
opposes laws helping fathers to maintain parent-child relationship
with their children. “America's fight against poverty has a
growing hole. Some say it's time to pay attention to the people
falling through it: men.”, “Missing
men”, “ by
Rebecca Tuhus-Dubrow, Boston Globe.
Proposed new laws and
policies, opposed by NOW, are hoped to “foster more stable
families, and ultimately greater support and opportunities for a
new generation of children”.
Fathers
are routinely and on a daily basis financially decimated and sunk
into poverty throughout the country by unconstitutional, draconian
and discriminatory laws (supported by NOW) and
their application by the whimsically named “family” courts
which have vested financial interest in so doing, not least for
receiving federal kidnap “incentive”
money that benefit the very same judges, courts, prosecutors,
counties and states that perpetrate such human rights atrocities
upon children and their fathers.
-
08.09.2008: “Rethinking Fathers’ Rights”- “Much of what's
wrong with family law today lies in warmed-over stereotypes of men
as unsuited to caring for their children.”, By
Dahlia Lithwick, Newsweek.
In
its criticism of fathers, Ms. Lithwick's article seems to display
a lack of understanding, typical of members of the media, of the
underlying issues which include, but are not limited to, the
massive financial benefits ($Billions annually) through
unconstitutional federal incentives to the states and their courts
involved in depriving fathers of their parental and constitutional
rights and life with their children.
Because
of the political and financial benefits that all three branches of
the government and states gain from the stacked cards against
fathers and their parental rights, normal and "quiet"
process of changing the unconstitutional laws and practices
thereupon is all but closed and not viable for fathers. What is
needed is a course more attuned to that of the Civil Rights Era if
fathers are going to gain their natural and constitutionally
protected equal and parental rights. Furthermore, the article
rightly suggests that "we need to hear" more stories
from fathers who do not follow Mr. Rockefeller's course of
actions. Yet, another issue the article displays a lack of
understanding of is that it is the media which the article should
be addressing in this regard, not the fathers given the media's
woeful disregard of plight of the very “quiet” fathers who
constantly try to present their cases of judicial misconduct and
bias to the media and end up facing almost always only media's
indifference and disinterest and sometimes even their hostility
which can only be assumed as a sign of media's systematic bias
against fathers. Unless, of course, an event occurs that shows
fathers in a negative light which, in this day and age, with the
compliant media ever ready to bash fathers, could mean any excuse
that "mothers" (who benefit from financial incentives of
unequal parenting orders by the courts) find to complain and blame
fathers for at which point, the media can not jump high enough to
highlight the story. Is it, then, any wonder that some fathers
feel they have to resort to such acts, as reclaiming their
children, to highlight the human rights atrocities of the
system?!
After all, equal parental rights are both a natural
and constitutionally protected rights that the system through its
courts violates every day in this country to the detriment of
children and their parents, not to mention the society at large.
-
08.09.2008: Toronto, Canada- Spider-Man Plywood Man protests- "I
want to see my kid,", Plywood Man demands. Toronto
Sun.
He
has been deprived of his parental rights and life with his child,
who lives with his female parent.
"Fathers
4 Justice [Canada] ... will tirelessly promote every child's
right to be raised by both parents on an equal basis in the event
of separation and or divorce," their website
says. Also see Newsweek
for similar articles.
-
08.08.2008: The
brave "Carolina
Nickel" is one of few courageous publications that dare
put the real issues out and expose judicial and official
atrocities upon
the Family and violations of the law to the public. And it does,
in spite of potential retaliation and commercial risk, stand
openly for the rule of law on a regular basis. It should be an
example to many individuals and (particularly “mainstream”)
media outlets.
We
wish there were more such publications, publishers and ordinary
people to help save the fabric of the society, i.e. the Family,
and stand for the rule of law and the Constitution in the courts.
Of particular interest in this issue (Vol. 35, No. 13) of the
Carolina Nickel are the Back
Cover and page
4 (an essay by Dr. Sanjari). However, let's make such brave
publications (more) successful and flourish in any which way that
we can. Please read and distribute widely.
-
08.08.2008: “For 'Maverick' Federal Judges, Life Tenure Is
Largely Unfettered
License” ,
BY NATHAN KOPPEL.
“Life tenure for federal judges aims to give them the
independence to do what is right -- not protect them while doing
wrong.”
“A
string of recent transgressions by a federal judge in Los Angeles
has some questioning whether the federal bench can adequately
police itself.”
This
article discusses an extremely tiny proportion of misconduct and
corruption by judges (both in state and federal courts) who feel
protected by judicially-assigned immunity, i.e. by putting
themselves above the law.
-
08.08.2008: “Should Supreme Court Justices Have Life Tenure?”,
Wall Street Journal Blog
Asks.
The answer is that the current set of US Supreme Court
justices need and must be removed immediately for the good of the
country. The
replacements should be appointed with a one-time term (most
appropriately of 10 years). Furthermore, any new appointee must be
required to adhere to the Constitution for the United States and,
in turn, require lower federal and state courts to adhere to the
Constitution which is the basis of the authority of all of the
said courts and judges.
The
current occupants of the US Supreme Court, in spite of their
sometime high-minded utterances, not only have failed in their
duties, committed misconduct and other constitutional violations,
but also they have miserably failed in requiring lower federal
courts and state courts to adhere to the Constitution and even to
the Supreme Court's own directives. Hence, only paying lip service
to the rule of law while it itself does (and by allowing both
federal and state courts to) continue to commit misconduct and
violate people's constitutionally protected rights. For Dr.
Sanjari's input see the blog
for August 08, 2008. Limited term appointment for justices was
earlier proposed
in 2004 by scholarly works of James E. DiTullio and John B.
Schochet (of University of Virginia School of Law).
-
08.08.2008: Bristol, United Kingdom- A group of Father
4 Justice, in a protest (video)
demanding equal treatment and respect for their equal parental
rights by “Family Court” judges, entered such a court asking
to talk with the judges who continue to violate fathers' rights
and deprive them of life with their children. The
judges not only refused to talk with the group, but also they also
in a cowardly action left the building.
Fire
alarms were set off, and the building was evacuated. The group
also entered a bank, HSBC, that, they say, collaborate with the
system's violations against their parental rights. The
international protests by fathers for their parental rights and
children are in distinct contrast to absence of same in the US.
The question is if such an absence is the result of dictatorial
and oppressive laws in the US, or there are other reasons!
-
08.08.2008: “A
Practice Guide: Making Child Support Orders Realistic and
Enforceable” National Council of Juvenile and Family Court
Judges (NCJFCJ).
February
2008.
“Twenty-six
percent of American children under the age of 18 are growing up in
single parent households. An additional fifteen percent live in
blended families. Absence of a parent is the leading cause of
poverty among children; absence of a parent is also increasingly
correlated to acts of juvenile
delinquency. High rates of
divorce, separation, and out-of-wedlock birth have transformed the
setting in which children are raised. This overwhelms the courts,
child support agency and the welfare system.”
[And, experience and facts show that judges are one of the primary
causes of this plight.]
'State
courts are inextricably intertwined with the success and perceived
justice [!?]
of
the child support enforcement system.
With
powerful and largely administrative enforcement tools research and
policy debates have refocused on key decision points that appear
to make a critical difference in ensuring child support is the
economic linchpin to family self-sufficiency that the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996
(PRWORA or “Welfare Reform”) intended it to be.'
Interesting
“Guide” with relevant reference information.
Keep in mind
the NCJFCJ's crimes (below) which they bought off with $300,000.00
to the DOJ. Compare this “Guide” with the “Magic Fountain”
article (07.29.2008 entry below) to see the NCJFCJ's hypocrisy and
their deliberate destruction of the family for their greed and
federal incentives.
-
08.08.2008: April 30, 2008- “The National Council of Juvenile
and Family Court Judges is a 70-year-old [criminal]
organization
comprised of members from every state in the country. Our
mission is to ensure that
each judge who handles juvenile or family matters has the
education, training and technical assistance to assist families
when they are most in need.”
[I.e.,
indoctrinate judges into violating and ignoring the law and the
Constitution and destroy families by removing fathers from their
children's lives in order to rake in federal incentive
$$Millions].
“In April, the National Council of Juvenile and
Family Court Judges (“NCJFCJ”)
agreed to
pay $300,000 to the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) in full
settlement of allegations that had been raised about how NCJFCJ
recorded staff time on federally funded projects, and allegations
about possible conflicts of interest.” [I.e.,
NCJFCJ bought off the DOJ not to continue their investigation of
NCJFCJ's crimes and fraud].
“From
the very beginning, NCJFCJ fully cooperated with the DOJ in its
review and in the ultimate resolution of these issues. We took
these allegations seriously as NCJFCJ is committed to ensuring
that our administrative standards and training policies are of
optimum quality. We have addressed all the concerns raised by the
DOJ, and by putting into place some administrative changes, have
ensured that the DOJ will not have such concerns again.”
“Although
we have and continue to dispute the characterization of some of
these concerns, we determined that it was in the best interests of
the NCJFCJ and its long relationship with the DOJ to settle these
issues and resolve the DOJ’s concerns. This allowed us to focus
on improvements to our administrative procedures and to continue
doing the quality work that helps judges all over the country.
There was no admission of liability in the settlement agreement.
We are now in a position to move forward and are pleased that DOJ
is fully satisfied with the measures we have taken.
Our
Executive Director, Mary Mentaberry, is a long-standing dedicated
public servant who has worked tirelessly to improve the
administration of the organization. She has the support and
confidence of the entire Board of Trustees and I, personally, am
proud to have her as a colleague and friend, as well as Executive
Director of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court
Judges.
The NCJFCJ looks forward to a long future of
cooperation with the DOJ on the important issues of improving
America’s juvenile and family justice system.
Honorable Susan
B. Carbon
Supervisory Judge, Concord Family Division, Concord,
NH
President, National Council of Juvenile and Family Court
Judges
April 30, 2008”
-
08.08.2008: “Economics of Judicially Induced Family Decline”
And “Why No One Wants to Hear Me Any More”. By
Stan Rains, a father.
When one carefully looks at the
de-construction of our economy, one will find in almost every
venue the commonality of the destruction of the family through
destruction of the fathers. This money is very expensive money.
Each dollar they stole costs 100s of dollars in damages.
- 08.08.2008: 'Spider-Man' and 'Plywood-Man' scale Layton's roof as part of a Day-long protest by members of Fathers 4 Justice. Witnesses reported seeing a man dressed as Spider-Man on the roof of an office building on Broadview Avenue, Toronto, Canada. Another man, referred to as 'Plywood-Man,' was also seen on the roof. The two are members of the Fathers 4 Justice, who had been behind some other well publicised protests, such as one at Buckingham Palace. "F4J Canada believes, and will tirelessly promote, every child's right to be raised by both parents on an equal basis in the event of separation or divorce, and further believes that such equality in parenting has been clearly shown to be in the best interests of children.", says Fathers 4 Justice website. The photos of the men dressed as superheroes protesting at locations across Canada may be found on their website.
-
08.07.2008: US Inaction and Elections and Matt O'Connor, Founder,
Fathers 4 Justice.
“
Last
year I discussed with Warren Farrell how fathers activists could
disrupt or heckle presidential candidates during rallies.
I
had also said to people that 'Fathers 4 Justice' was by
definition, when I founded it in December 2002, a direct action
group - not a talking shop or charity.
Last
year it took two British
activists to risk life, limb and liberty to lay the path down for
American dads to follow
when
they scaled the Lincoln memorial.
Yet
where are the American men to fill these empty shoes?
We
have seen protesting Americans arrested in Tiananmen Square this
morning, global warming protestors on the Golden Gate Bridge
(another idea of ours), women like Rosa Parks lead by example when
protesting against discrimination
yet
where are all the fathers who proclaim that they would do anything
for their kids?
Some
people say well it's different over here in the US to Britain.
Fuck off.
Is it different in Tiananmen Square, for global
warming protestors or Rosa Parks? I don't think so.
In the
words of the Joker in the Dark Knight, 'Did your balls drop
off?'
The
bottom line is that with the right people running the show in the
US, I am convinced that American dads would rise to the occasion
and demonstrate their undoubted love for their kids.
At the
moment though, the longer this goes on, the more we squander the
opportunity to use the Presidential elections to win publicity for
our cause, 'to make the injustice visible', the more we condemn
the new fathers entering the system to suffer the same
injustice.
What is worse is that you have the brain power to do
this. You have the intellectual back up in Stephen Baskerville,
Glenn Sachs, Warren Farrell, Tom Golden etc!
It
doesn't have to be this way but it is down to you to write your
own history. You don't have to be the United States of Eunuchs,
you can be the United States of Fatherhood
and
demonstrate to the children of the world that American dads would
do ANYTHING for their kids.
That American dads will lead the
world.
Go get em.
Matt O'Connor,
Founder, Fathers 4
Justice ”
-
08.06.2008: Cambridge, United Kingdom- 'A study
published today by the University of Cambridge suggests that the
tide of public opinion is turning against the view that women can
"have it all". It
finds that in Britain and the United States there is "mounting
concern" that women who play a full and equal role in the
workforce do so at the expense of family life.' The
Independent, UK.
The article curiously seems to overly
empathize with women in spite of the pendulum having swung to the
extreme against men and families in family matters and law by
women who want it all and “having it all” at the expense of
the family and children. What remains is that ultimately it is the
children and the concept of Family that suffer in the process of
women achieving their superiority in society in bringing about the
“New World Order”.
- 08.04.2008: Exposing judicial misconduct and corruption in US Courts. - “An effort in the U.S. Supreme Court to expose judicial misconduct- “In Chamber” application to the Justices for injunctive relief and a stay order in the DeLano case, 06-4780-bk, CA2. This application exposes one of many instances of fraud, conspiracy and other judicial misconduct in and by US courts including Bankruptcy Courts.
-
08.04.2008: Memphis, TN- “Convicted
Killer Gets Custody of Kids”, By
Current.
Welcome
to the “New World Order”!
Yet another indication of the
corruption and gender bias against fathers in the courts all over
the US having got so out of control, a
“Killer
...
convicted of voluntary manslaughter in the 2006 shooting death of
her minister husband, has taken custody of [their] three
daughters”,
whereas
loving, caring and fit fathers are routinely deprived of their
natural and constitutional parental rights, no doubt primarily for
the greed of the courts and the states destroying families while
reaping federal kidnap money incentives.
- 07.30.2008: “The South Dakota Amendment E”, The 'Piece (by Gary Zerman, Esq.) Slate Magazine Refused [to provide “equal time”] to Publish' regarding prevalent judicial misconduct and the need for judicial accountability and in 'reply to Bert Brandenburg’s (Executive Director, Justice At Stake -JAS), two Slate pieces “Rushmore to Judgment,” March 14, and “Bench-Clearing Brawl,” July 28, 2006..'.
-
07.30.2008: A Petition
for Impeachment* of Judge
Rex
L. Reed**
(pictured
here)
of
Kosciusko
county, Indiana, along with a supporting Notice of Felony*
that includes evidence of his pervasive criminal misconduct, were
filed in accordance with the Indiana and United States
constitutions and laws with
the office of the Chairman*** of the Judiciary Committee of
Indiana House of Representatives with copies sent to other
relevant Indiana legislators as well as to the Executive branch.
A
press
release
is
also issued and disseminated extensively in Indiana and nationally
to the media and other organizations, bodies and relevant federal
agencies such as law enforcement and those providing federal
funding to States.
* These documents maybe used as templates
for filing impeachment against any federal or any of the states'
judges or officials. Appropriate modifications required for each
case. See projects
or
Contact
Dr.
Sanjari.
** Could this be the same Rex
Leroy Reed
who
has not got any father listed,
although there are listings for mother (Ethel
Rose Lewis,
1890 – 1978) and wife (Velma
Iola Stokes)!?
Could Reed's criminal atrocities on the bench against fathers
before his court in violation of the Indiana and US laws and
Constitution be a manifestation of his psychological condition
resulting from fatherlessness! Studies show that to be very
likely!
*** Linda Lawson, House Judiciary Chair, Rep.,
District 1, Hammond & Munster, h1@in.gov
.
-
07.29.2008: “Magic Fountain”, "The Law and Economics of
Child Support Payments", By William S. Comanor, Published
by Edward Elgar Publishing, 2004 ISBN 1843761211, 9781843761211.
“A veritable Goldmine of information arguing against the current
Child Support system and its enforcement.”
“This
book deals with a lot on this and related issues. The book is
dated [2004] but, it will surprise you at how much data even at
the time of the publishing of this book showed that most men did
not intentionally avoid child support. On the page
135 of this online book review, it clearly states that in 1992
66% of women self reporting on why the fathers of their children
did not pay child support stated because the father could not
afford it. So, where was the Bogey Man Millionaire Playboy for
whom the laws were designed”?, says a reviewer.
On page
136, ' Family Court judge L. Mendel Rivers, Jr.
explained:
“The
problem is, chronic non-supporters do not have dependable jobs,
nor tax refunds,
nor
sizaeble property. That's why they are chronic.
As
crude as it sounds, the one remedy that almost always works is
incarceration. We
family
court judges call it 'the
magic fountain.'...
Of
course, there is no magic. The money is paid by his mother, or by
the second wife,
or
by some other innocent who perhaps had to liquidate her life's
savings.“
The
theory is that child support is supposed to be set to meet the
child's needs within the limits of the obligor's ability to pay.
When the difference between theory and reality is so great that
the required revenue can only be generated through medieval
kidnappings for ransom
in
the style of Judge Rivers, the system must ultimately collapse of
its own weight. This is exactly what is happening. '
-
07.29.2008: Erin Pizzey, champion of women's rights, says radical
feminist plans to let victims of domestic abuse get away with
murder are an affront to morality. Ms. Pizzey rebukes Harriet
Harman, the British acting Prime Minister, for advocating what
amounts to cold blooded murder. By
Erin Pizzey, Daily Mirror. Full
Article.
“Effectively, what Harman and the ultra-feminist
lobby want is a licence for women to kill.”, Ms. Pizzey wrote
referring to it as “a perverse new moral code”, adding “Only
in the warped mindset of feminist radicals should we protect the
vulnerable by downgrading our moral abhorrence of murder.” while
expressing 'an outrage that thanks to Ms Harman, feminists such as
Bindel can influence public policy'.
As correct as Ms. Pizzy
is, she may not appreciate that these abhorrent acts and policies,
which also include unlawful and amoral removal of fit fathers from
their children's lives, are pervasive in the United States already
and are being advocated by the British and US governments world
wide in order to undermine and destroy the last bastion and fabric
of society, i.e. The Family, which is seen by the perpetrators and
those pulling the strings as an obstacle to the New World Order
and their control of it.
-
07.28.2008: On July 28, 2008, Boston father, Clark Rockefeller,
took charge of his 7-year old daughter in Boston in an attempt to
re-assert his constitutional and natural parental rights which had
been removed from him unconstitutionally by the corrupt “family”
courts
(based
upon information available).
Based
upon known information, Mr. Rockefeller is a loving and fit
parent, yet the FBI (1) and the media
(1) have portrayed the event as a child “kidnapping”, an
absurd accusation given that the child is his
daughter,
and unless and until proven otherwise in a competent court of law
(as opposed to “family” court with vested
interest- Title IV-D “incentives”, etc), as a fit father,
Mr. Rockefeller (described by witnesses who know him as "...
he's
a gentleman. He's a kind man. Polite. Very, very intelligent,
...")
has
every right and expectation
to
have and exercise his equal parental rights. Despite and beneath
the veneer of the media misrepresentations and the FBI (1) listing
Mr. Rockefeller as “wanted” (apparently for “kidnapping”)
in regard to this incident, it appears that the only “danger”
that the child may be in is being so-loved by his father given the
statements by Aileen Ang, the lady driver who drove them from
Boston to New York, as Mr. Rockefeller and his daughter being
“good
with each other,”
and
appeared to be playing together in the back seat of the car. She
added that she heard little Reigh say “Daddy
I love you” as
she rode in the back seat, and the father retorting, that he loved
her more!
He
is thought to have left for abroad with his daughter. Objective
observers favouring the rule of law and the Constitution in
determining post-divorce parental rights and their application in
the US courts wish Mr. Rockefeller and his daughter best of luck
and a peaceful and prosperous future together.
The states and
federal governments and their instruments of parental oppression
and repression in courts may note that loving fathers will not
stand for the continued deprivation of their children's rights,
their own rights and family life with their children!
(1) The
recorded documents and by its own actions, FBI has shown that it
is not interested in combating crimes against the People, and that
it appears their “law enforcement” activities are directed at
those who come up against State and its instruments of oppression
and repression. And given that the oppression of fathers begins in
“family” courts, a natural outcome is that the “law
enforcement” actions will continue the said oppression and
repression aided and abetted by the media disinformation and
misrepresentation of the news and the truth.
-
07.27.2008- Yet another child death due to Indiana's “children
and families” agency.
“Baby placed in foster home despite
warnings.” By
Tim Evans, IndyStar
.
“Documents
obtained by The Star show child advocate repeatedly raised
concerns about safety of couple's home. The state agency
responsible for protecting children once again is facing
accusations that it failed to act on repeated warnings in the
weeks preceding the death of a child.” Full
Article.
Yet again, the Indiana “Child Protection”
Services (CPS) and “Department of Children and families” (DCF)
show that they only remove children for profit
and greed incentives. Their actions or inaction are selective
and prejudiced and are indicative of a policy and tendency to
maximize the incentive
profit instead of truly caring for children and families.
-
07.24.2008: “LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER”
“U.S. government: We
know parenting better than you. Proposals
would give Washington unprecedented control over kid.” By
Chelsea
Schilling © 2008 WorldNetDaily.
Could this be a pending
pretext for continuous monitoring in every home (given the record
of the “child support” enforcement, CPS, DCF and “family
courts”? George Orwell (“1984” and “Animal Farm”) would
have felt vindicated!
-
07.23.2008: “It is a story
of fractured families, empty bank accounts and missing money.”
By
Chuck Goudie, ABC News Team, Chicago, IL. So, what else is new
where there are the hands of corrupt state and federal agencies
involved in deliberately destroying families! State of Illinois,
through its Department of Healthcare and Family Services, “cleaned
out [a father's] entire [$$1000.00s in] bank account [in his
absence at work] for [what is whimsically termed as] child
support”. They “took it all”, “100 percent of [his]
income”. The human rights atrocities and constitutional
violations by the (all 52) state and federal governments to
satisfy their insatiable greed as well as their hunger for control
have made them careless in their actions under the guise of “child
support” which is nothing short of day light robbery from
parents and their children and destroying the victims lives.
Notwithstanding the unconstitutional and amoral nature of the
states and federal governments' actions, the “[m]ost puzzling
[in this particular case as well as in many others] is what
happened to all that money the state seized from his account in
June. The boy's mother said she hasn't seen any of it.”!
Could
it be that the State of Illinois has, as is customarily and
routinely done by all states, once again, defrauded yet another
family and the money has gone into its and its agencies' coffers
as “undistributed” collected funds, a whimsical term for
simply the State robbing families?!
-
07.23.2008: Commendations go to Mayor Tom Dolan and the City of
Sandy City, Utah for
having recognized and proclaimed
that fathers and mothers have equal rights to life with their
children and that the best parent is both parents for the children
and that children
have the right to both parents
in
their lives. Further congratulations to the Mayor and the Sandy
City for proclaiming to uphold these natural, fundamental and
legal rights of both parents.
Which other community, city and
state in this country has the courage, fortitude and political
will to put aside its greed and ignore (opposing) pressure groups
and follow the example of Mayor Dolan and Sandy City????????????
-
07.23.2008: Connecticut Supreme Court Rules Against DCF in 5-0
Ruling.
Staff
Writers- Connecticut DCF Watch
“Hartford, CT - The
Connecticut State Supreme Court ruled against DCF in a 5-0 ruling
[that] willfully denied Earl B. a hearing in regards [to] the
Connecticut Juvenile Training School. Earl B. was just a notch in
DCF's
belt so they can trigger their Federal funding.
Earl B. meant nothing to DCF or the Assistant Attorney Generals
involved in this case. It's
not a surprise that DCF knowingly wants to deny both child and
parent their due process of rights.
The Supreme Court got this right.
Below is the link to the
ruling.
Case Name: Earl B. v. Commissioner of Children and Families;
Case No: SC18063”
Connecticut DCF Watch can be reached
at:
Forestville, CT 06011,
860-833-4127,
www.connecticutDCFwatch.com
, E-Mail: admin@connecticutDCFwatch.com
-
07.09.2008: Indiana Appellate Court issued an opinion
ruling
that paternity, when obtained through fraud, can be rescinded .
On
08 July 2008 the Indiana Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the
Paternity of M.M. in which a man had been defrauded into believing
he was the father and had paternity testing showing that he was
not the father. Elkhart Superior Court, under judge
David Bonfiglio,
denied his petition to rescind paternity stating that allowing a
man who was defrauded into believing he was the father to rescind
paternity and not pay child support would go
against public policy.
Apparently, in the opinion of judge
Bonfiglio,
another Elkhart crooked and miscreant judge (see below and here),
the Indiana public condones fraud and criminal deception and is
happy to benefit from fruits of crime. The honorable people in
Indiana should and must be alarmed and disgusted by, and vote out
judges like Bonfiglio
who
destroy
families
and
benefit (under Title
IV-D
federal
incentive to courts, States and county prosecutors) from crime in
the name of the people of Indiana.
Another
interesting aspect of the case (see opinion)
is that the mother, whom the Appellate court agreed had committed
fraud, was represented by the Attorney
General of
State of Indiana paid for by Indiana tax payers on their behalf.
It is the same A-G, Mr. Stephen
Carter
who
has defended crooked and criminal Indiana judges in state and
federal courts paid for by the Indiana tax payer.
Indiana,
stand up to and show these crooks in black robes and their
protectors in State offices that you are a better people than they
take you for and represent you to the world as!
-
06.23.2008: State of Indiana (USA) Uses Federal
Agency to Harass Citizens And Silence Father of Two Children
It Unlawfully Kidnapped
.The
State of Indiana (IN), USA, is amongst 50 States in the United
State that resort to unlawful abduction and abuse of children in
order to profit from federal incentives (42 U.S.C. 651 to 669b -
Title IV-D). Amongst the children the State of Indiana has
unlawfully kidnapped,
are two British children whose abduction was perpetrated in 2001
by Elkhart county, IN, under false pretext, unlawfully and
fraudulently...(continued
here).
-
06.06.2008: New Hampshire Governor, John Lynch, “is allowing his
constituents' families - such as Elena's - to be destroyed - for
federal funds!”
Elena
Katz
is
under arrest for removing her diabetic daughter from the clutches
of the federal “incentive” profit seeking “Child Services”
in New Hampshire. Elena's daughter will be taken into custody of
NH DCYS that “almost killed the girl on three occasions”.
-
05.25.2008: Mother 'says
her children were essentially kidnapped by Governor Jennifer
Granholm, Attorney General Mike Cox, and various judges,
administrators and doctors [of
state of of Michigan, US]
to
be used as "cash cows" for the benefit of the state's
child foster care system. That system is largely farmed out to
private non-profit agencies who receive federal funds for each
child. She says the alleged kidnappers have profited because they
sit on the boards of agencies in that system.' “Banks filed suit
in U.S. District Court under federal racketeering and civil rights
statutes, demanding her children's return, and calling for an
immediate investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice into the
alleged misuse of federal funds by the State of Michigan in hers
and thousands of other foster care cases.“
Such
acts by all 50 states of the United States are part of an
officially sanctioned criminal and fraudulent racketeering
designed as a social engineering tool as well as fraudulently
defrauding parents of their finances and constitutional rights
under the disgraced, discredited and unconstitutional Title IV of
the Social Security Act. By far the overwhelming victims of such a
criminal and corrupt racketeering by the states, in conspiracy
with the federal government, are, however, fathers and their
children. Nevertheless, even the destruction of one family and
their lives is one too many!
-
03.26.2008: As part of the ongoing campaign (see
below “What
YOU Could Do”)
to
seek redress and expose the insidious judicial corruption in
Indiana courts, many
victims of Indiana judicial corruption signed and sent this
communication
to the full Indiana legislature
(The
House and the Senate members)
as
well as 60+ media outlets regarding wide spread judicial
corruption in Indiana and Randall
Terry Shepard's (Indiana Chief Justice's) role in it
and
his state of judiciary address (01.16.2008, this section, below)
to the Indiana legislature.
“Dear Indiana Legislator,
On
January 16, 2008, Randall
Terry Shepard, Chief Justice of Indiana delivered his 21st
State of the Judiciary address to a joint session of the Indiana
General Assembly, as required by Indiana Constitution. In
conclusion, he stated:
"In short, this is a judiciary with
reform in its heart, its feet on the ground, and its mind focused
on its customers."
Having experienced the quality of
justice and conduct of judges in Indiana courts first hand, we,
the undersigned, will not even waste your time discussing the
judge's premise for the content of his speech. Suffice it to say
that Mr. Shepard
(or rather “RANDELL
SHEPERD”, see footnote -FN1) is correct to refer to
"customers" as rule of law and justice have become
commodities in Indiana courts and are sold to the highest bidders
through abuse and disdain for the law,....”. See the link above
for the full text of communication to the legislators.
-
03.07.2008: The
Judicial Conference of the United States, which is the highest
policy making all-judge body of the federal judiciary,
presided over by the chief justice of the Supreme Court,
is
set, in a “secret”
(!)
hearing on March 11, 2008, to approve new rules to cover, protect
and immunize abusive and corrupt federal judges against public
complaints of the said miscreant judges. The circle of judicial
tyranny is now complete.
- 03.30.2008: “unilateral divorce has a positive [increased] impact on violent crime rates, with an 8% to 12% average increase for the period under consideration.”, as shown by research “using crime rates from the FBI’s Uniform Crime Report program for the period 1965-1998.” Furthermore, “arrest data not only confirms the findings of a positive [increased] impact on violent crime but also shows that this impact is concentrated among those age groups (15 to 24) that are more likely to engage in these type of offenses.”
-
02.29.2008: Press
Release
and
the
Brief
In Support
:
Indiana
Court Judge Subject Of Anticipated Federal Investigation Resigns
Prematurely: Circuit
Court Judge Michael
D. Cook of
Plymouth, Marshall County, Indiana,
resigned
from the
bench. The
premature resignation coming well before the end of his term of
office, took effect today. While on the bench, judge Cook
knowingly, and with the knowledge of chief justice
Randall
Terry Shepard
of
Indiana
Supreme Court, violated federal laws and constitutional rights
of many Indiana parents resulting in abuse and endangerment of
children as well as in fraud upon the United States and people of
Indiana.
Read
the
Press
Release
and
Brief
In Support
sent
to 50+ media outlets.
Distribute
these
1-page files widely to your local and other media outlets and
Indiana and federal legislators and law enforcement agencies to
underline the judicial corruption in Indiana courts.
-
02.20.2008: You criticize our corruption and fraud, and we will
cut you off from Indiana courts; say
”RANDELL
SHEPERD”
and
his Indiana Supreme Court CORPORATION to lawyers:
“Indiana
Court Bars Lawyer[s]
For
Criticizing An Opinion” , New
York Times. Intimidation, coercion, violation of the First
Amendment, bully tactics and cover up of fraud and criminal
activities by ”RANDELL
SHEPERD”
and
his Indiana
Supreme Court CORPORATION against people of Indiana even
against lawyers
(obviously
the said lawyers are not part of the inner group of “brethren[s]”:
This
New
York Times (link)
article
(pdf)
is
a sign of inherent corruption in Indiana courts and
cover
up
of
same by
”RANDELL
SHEPERD”
and
his cronies and retaliation against anyone who exposes the Indiana
courts' unconstitutional and corrupt practices. (Not long ago, the
Indiana Court of Appeals denied, not surprisingly but evidently
wrongly, that Indiana
courts exhibited lynch mob mentality and conduct akin to those of
“KKK”!).
For other violations, including discrimination and conspiracy, by
Indiana Supreme Court resulting in destruction of families and
children see here.
Also
see below.
Any
one has any question as to how they keep the
corruption
and
violations
against
the people covered up
now!?
- 02.16.2008: Please consider filing an Amicus Curiae (“Friend of the Court”) paper or a letter to the US Supreme Court in support of a father and his child who are victims of judicial corruption by Elkhart, IN, courts and judges as well as by the county prosecutor, et al. (see Case # 1, below). Contact for information.
- 02.12.2008: Please attend the hearing of and support Stuart Showalter, a parent victimized by the Boone county court and officials. Time: 10:00a.m. Tuesday, February 12, 2008, Venue: the Boone County Superior Court II.
-
01.27.2008: Are
they Corporations
or
are they people's courts
and
(“elected”) judges,
prosecutors,
Attorneys
General,
Child
Protective Services,
...? Why are they on the Stock Exchange (check
Dunn
& Bradstreet
for
your “favorite” court, judge, agency, in any state). See
JUDICIARY
COURTS OF THE STATE OF INDIANA,
its
CEO, chief justice (“Randall
Shepard”,
aka “TRADED” as “RANDELL
SHEPERD”,
page 2),
ELKHART
COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT
and
ELKHART
COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
,
Judge
REX
REED
(page
2) pictured here,
and
KOSCIUSKO
CIRCUIT COURT
and
County, as well as other Indiana courts, prosecutors, and counties
(see their “cuts
( IC-31-25-4-23) of profit”,
page 10). Are they trading us and our children on the stock market
on our misery, destruction of our families, removal / kidnapping
of
our children whether as “non-custodial” parents, or removal
for adoption, violation of our parental and other constitutional
rights? All for the mighty dollar fraud “incentive” that state
and its agencies and courts receive from federal government for
these destructions. Are they trading on these “blood” moneys
on the stock market? If not, why is a judicial (?) court on the
Stock Exchange ?!?!?!
Could this be why people, especially
the self-represented litigants, are constantly denied justice and
rule of law in courts by the judges ?!?!?!
The questions
you and all of us must be asking are:
1-
What are the commodities that the courts and judges, the county
prosecutors, the CPS, etc, are trading on the stock market? Is it
our children?, Is it the incentive they receive for unlawful
kidnapping
/ removal
of
our children? Is it for unlawfully putting unconstitutionally
created “non-custodial” fathers in prisons and trade their
labor to other corporations for profit?
For what commodity /
incentive are they creating fatherless children....?
2- How much have they profited and are profiting from me and my children ? I demand all of it back. This father never gave consent to be part of the Corporation of state of Indiana supreme court, court of appeals and county (Elkhart or any other) courts (operating under Commercial Code?. They certainly do not operate under the laws and Constitutions of Indiana and the United States. Hence, the daily and repeated violations of the laws and Constitutions by the Indiana judges)!
3- Why and for what commercial activity are judge “SHEPERD” and the Indiana Supreme Court listed as Corporations on the Stock Market ?
4-
Why and for what commercial activity are judge “REX
REED”
and
Kosciusko
Circuit Court listed as Corporations on the Stock Market?
5- Why and for what commercial activity are other counties and their courts in Indiana and other States listed as Corporations on the Stock Market?
6- We were never informed of, nor have consented to be members of the Corporation and be hauled in front of those Corporate "courts" clearly (through their disdain for and violations of the Constitution) operating under other laws than the Constitution! Hence, they, as Corporations, have no jurisdiction upon the people. Therefore, does it not follow that their orders are void ab initio (from the beginning) and void in toto (in total)?
7-
Are they public servants (judges), courts, and (supposedly)
"elected" officials, or are they private Corporations?
They can NOT be both!
Are you asking these questions from your
judges and other state officials who deprive you of your children,
livelihood, freedom, and even possibly life?
You should,
for it maybe YOUR child or your parental rights they will remove
next!
And where are the media in all this, burying their heads in the sand, or in on the fraud!?!?!?!
- 01.24.2008: Human Rights abuse of two British teenagers (The Brays): by “The Administration for Children's Services” in New York. Moral degeneracy of the US “Child Protective” system reaches new heights.(BBC).
-
01.22.2008: In the absence of any valid legal logic, judge Theresa
L. Springmann (of
US District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne)
repeats
her contrived and made up pretext to dismiss Dr.
Sanjari's Motion (under Rule 59) To Reconsider her earlier
(10.16.2007) order to dismiss Dr. Sanjari's suit to have the
unlawful and unconstitutional “sole-custody” order of Elkhart
Superior Court (issued by now-ex judge Michael D. Cook of Marshal
County, and perpetuated by miscreant judge Rex
L. Reed (pictured here) of Kosciusko
County) declared void
ab initio.
By doing so, judge Theresa L. Springmann has practiced law from
the bench (unlawful), deprived Dr. Sanjari of his constitutionally
protected rights, committed fraud in protecting Indiana judge Rex
L. Reed, and violated her oath of office, and hence committed
treason against the United States. This is yet another proof of
judges protecting and covering up for their “brethren” judges.
-
01.16.2008: Today Randall
Terry Shepard, Chief Justice of Indiana delivered
his 21st State of the Judiciary address to a joint session of the
Indiana General Assembly, as required by Indiana Constitution. In
conclusion, he stated:
"In
short, this is a judiciary with reform in its heart, its feet on
the ground, and its mind focused on its customers."
Having experienced the quality of justice and conduct of judges in
Indiana courts first hand, many (multitude of) of their victims
would testify to having been treated as "customers" as
rule
of law and justice have become commodities in Indiana courts
and
are sold to the highest bidders or on the whim of the many corrupt
judges' presiding over those courts through abuse and disdain for
the law including Mr. Shepard
himself and his band of state court judges.
Yet, there isn't a
day gone by that the said Constitution and laws of Indiana are
deliberately and knowingly violated by the Indiana judiciary as
part of their insidious and ever expanding judicial tyranny which
they perpetrate upon the multitude of unsuspecting people of
Indiana who are unknowing of the laws and their rights under them
including their constitutional rights that the said judiciary so
contemptuously and deliberately ignore and trample upon. They do
so with the full knowledge of conspiracy with the Indiana Court of
Appeals (IN-CA) and Supreme Court (IN-SC), which is ruled by an
iron fist by the said Chief Justice.
Therefore, Mr. Shepard
himself is ultimately, as the chief administrator of Indiana
courts with direct responsibility to oversee all Indiana judges,
is responsible and answerable. This is in addition to the fact
that Mr. Shepard
himself has known about (informed by the undersigned, et al. on
more than one occasion) and committed and indeed aided and abetted
in such judicial atrocities not least by covering up those
unlawful violations. Additionally, judge Shepard
himself has lied and denied facts that had been made available to
him and recorded by the IN-CA. If Indiana courts are to be given
back their integrity and corruption within them stemmed, Randall
Terry Shepard must go
and
open the way for a chief justice with integrity who is not
implicated in unlawful acts and violations upon Indiana people!
-
01.12.2008: Open
Letter
to
“RANDELL
SHEPERD”,
CEO (chief judge) of Indiana
Supreme
Court
requesting
a criminal investigation into Indiana judges' corruption and
criminal violations perpetrated by them upon parents and children.
See “What
YOU Could
Do”,
below.
Sent
to 50+ media outlets.
-
Judicial Conspiracy: “[State
& Federal] Judges
Being Secretly Trained
[through
State Justice Institute, paid for by the tax payer and under
government sponsorship!] To Resist Arguments Based on Constitution
...[and] from aggrieved ... pro se litigants”.
Is
this to disenfranchise anyone standing up to judicial corruption?
Or, maybe judges covering up for each others' crimes (e.g. other
judges covering up for judge Rex
L. Reed's [pictured here] violations)?
- Judicial Corruption: Judges Speak Out!
- 12.19.2007: The Magna Carta And Price of Hypocrisy, Perversion of Law & Justice... A Short Essay by Dr. Amir Sanjari.
-
10.16.2007: In the absence of any valid legal logic, judge Theresa
L. Springmann (of
US District Court, Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne)
contrives
a
pretext to dismiss Dr.
Sanjari's suit against the unlawful and unconstitutional (void
ab initio)
“sole-custody” order of Elkhart Superior Court (issued by
now-ex judge Michael D. Cook of Marshal County, and perpetuated by
miscreant judge Rex
L. Reed of Kosciusko
County). By doing so, judge Theresa L. Springmann has
practiced law from the bench (unlawful), deprived Dr. Sanjari of
his constitutionally protected rights, committed fraud in
protecting Indiana judge Rex
L. Reed, and violated her oath of office, and hence committed
treason against the United States.
The “sole-custody”
order, the subject of the in
rem
suit
is the order the Gratzols (Alison and John) in conspiracy with
their attorney Max K. Walker, Jr. (Elkhart, IN) fraudulently
sought and Elkhart court fraudulently issued whereby they
kidnapped
Dr.
Sanajri's minor children in in the fall of 2001.
- 10.12.2007: Submission to The Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference of the United States (28 U.S.C. §351-364) – Based upon Experience in federal (and state) courts in Indiana - by Dr. Amir H. Sanjari
-
09, 2007:
Judiciary
Committees of the US Congress and federal law enforcement agencies
have been provided with evidence of and asked to investigate
Indiana state judiciaries at all County, Appeals and Supreme
Courts levels (jurisdiction
due to federal funding) for
criminal misconduct and other federal violations.
Furthermore, investigation was sought into US District Courts
(federal) and judges in Indiana for "selective prosecution"
, collusion and unduly delaying and dismissing cases brought by
self-represented (“pro
se”)
plaintiffs against state officials and judiciary, as well as for
conspiracy to cover up state judiciary's and officials' atrocities
and depriving plaintiffs of their due process and constitutional
rights.
[See
above “Judicial Conspiracy” involving State Justice Institute
and Indiana and federal courts.]
- 09, 2007: Testimony (regarding corruption of federal judiciary) to the Judicial Commission on Draft Rules Governing Judicial Conduct and Disability Proceedings of The Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference of the United States.
- 08.23.2007- Some members of the Indiana Lynch-Mob (John G. Baker, "Chief Judge", with concurrence of Darden J. J. Najam and J. Garrard, Sr.) outdo their own corruption and violations of the Constitution and laws of the Land by “banning” Dr. Sanjari from filing appeals to the Indiana Court of Appeals (IN-CA) without their permission in order to cover up the misconduct and fraudulent, corrupt and vile acts of judge Rex L. Reed and Elkhart Superior Court clerk (Stephanie Burgess, et al.). Evidently, they have not heard of the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution.
Furthermore,
the
IN-CA lynch mob even refused to docket the papers timely filed
appealing the unlawful hearing (April 03, 2007) and orders (April
04, 2007) depriving Dr. Sanjari of his children by said criminal
Rex
Reed (pictured
here)
in
violation of due process (hearing
and order without jurisdiction and without due notice to Dr.
Sanjari) as the evidence against this out of control outlaw judge
is overwhelming. The said IN-CA lynch mob and Reed
reach a new depth in their cesspool of corruption.
- 08.20.2007: Another father and a grand father issue notices of legal war against Elkhart County's and Indiana's corrupt judiciary and officials and their cohort attorneys. Included amongst the summons recipients are, but not limited to: Steve Carter (A-G), Curtis T. Hill (Elkhart Prosecutor), Bruce Wells (Deputy Elkhart Prosecutor), Max K. Walker (a woman-beating crooked attorney), Indiana Commission on Judicial Qualification (a secretive arm of the IN supreme court covering up and ignoring the judiciary's atrocities and defrauding people of Indiana), Indiana Court of Appeals Judge James S. Kirsch, Elkhart Court Clerk Stephanie Burgess, Elkhart County Sheriff, Elkhart County Judge David Bonfiglio, ... . Of course, for such atrocities there is NO judicial or official immunity applicable.
”There
are forces in operation which must inevitably work the downfall of
slavery.”
(Frederick
Douglas)
- 08.03.2007: Letter sent to Elkhart county, Indiana, sheriff informing him that execution and processing of any order (unlawful and void ab initio) issued by Elkhart court and judges thereof in this case would be unlawful, and that the sheriff department, sheriff himself and his officers would be liable for federal prosecution both in their personal and official capacities.
- 08.03.2007: Letter to Indiana Governor, Mitch Daniels regarding Indiana judges' and officials' corruption and criminal activities, and demand for return of Dr. Sanjari's children to him.
-
07.23.2007: Indiana Supreme Court exhibits evidence of its
collusion and conspiracy
to
cover
up the criminal activities and violations of the law (federal and
Indiana) and the Constitution under the color of law by Elkhart
Superior Court No. 5, purported and criminal judge Rex
L. Reed (pictured here) of Kosciusko
circuit court (Warsaw, IN) and their cohorts. Now there exists
evidence that Indiana Supreme Court (Randall
Shepard and the full court “all justices concur”) have
purportedly looked into the custody appeals cases before Indiana
court of appeals, IN-CA, (pending for the past almost 2 years
without any ruling by the said IN-CA!) in this matter and have
become parties to the fraud and conspiracy amongst the Elkhart
court, criminal purported judge Rex
L. Reed, IN-CA, et
al.
In order to cover up the criminal activities of the
aforementioned.
Furthermore, the Indiana Supreme Court has shown its incompetence in its oversight of activities of the IN-CA since it alludes to the undersigned not having filed an appeal in a case that has been filed by th latter and kept under wraps by the IN-CA without establishment of a docket or any entries or ruling upon it in violation of the undersigned's First Amendment, Seventh Amendment, Ninth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution. This is yet another tactic by corrupt judiciary and officials (see also item immediately below) to divert attention from their own criminal activities by casting aspersions on their opponents. A federal investigation akin to the “Operation Greylord” by the FBI (circa 1985, re dozens of criminal Chicago judges) into all levels of the Indiana judiciary and state officials for criminal activities is well overdue.
-
07.18.2007: When, as has been the case throughout these events,
the corrupt officials and judiciary do not have the truth and the
right on their side
they
resort to lies and misrepresentation just to provide their cohort
“brethren” judge in the case an excuse to rule against their
adversary. Such is the corrupt practices of Indiana Attorney
General and his deputy David Arthur in defending the criminal
judge Rex
L. Reed (pictured here) of Kosciusko
Circuit Court, Indiana, against whom the undersigned has
brought lawsuits in federal and Indiana courts. (Even after this,
the criminal Rex
Reed pretends to rule upon the undersigned's custody case
without jurisdiction in violation of federal law and the
Constitution). By filing a fatuous and irrelevant letter, David
Arthur attempts to distract attention from his and his client's
corrupt and criminal practices and make the undersigned
self-represented look culpable. This is the undersigned's response
filed in Kosciusko
court in the case he filed against criminal Rex
L. Reed.
-
04.09.2007: Dr. Sanjari files Petition For Writ Of Certiorari from
the Indiana Courts to the United States Supreme Court
regarding
the fraudulent, unconstitutional and unlawful removal of the
father's equal parental rights (equal legal and physical custody)
by the criminal former wife Alison Gratzol (Elkhart, IN) in
conspiracy with her corrupt attorney Max Walker (Elkhart, IN) and
Elkhart Superior court and special judge Michael D. Cook (of
Marshall circuit court, Plymouth, IN) and special judge Rex
L. Reed (of Kosciusko
circuit court, Warsaw, IN) who have all committed and/or
conspired and/or aided and abetted in committing fraud, child
abuse, kidnapping
of
minors across state lines, obstruction of justice, unlawful
tampering of official court records in conjunction with Elkhart
Superior court No. 5 administrator (Kathy) and clerk (Stephanie
Burgess). The said judges have additionally lied in court orders
and defrauded the undersigned and the US federal government (in
violation of the social security act and 42 U.S.C. Title IV-D)
under the color of law and in conspiracy with Indiana Attorney
General (Steve Carter and Deputy David Arthur) and Elkhart county
prosecutor (Curtis T. Hill, Jr. and Deputy Bruce Wells). Other
federal and Indiana lawsuits are pending against some of the said
actors. IN Court of Appeals and IN supreme court (Chief judge
Shepard
appointed Rex
Reed personally) conspired to cover up the said actors and
judges' fraud, misconduct and constitutional violations. IN
supreme court refused to consider the undersigned's Petition for
fear that they themselves become further implicated in the
fraudulent and unlawful activities of their appointed judges in
the case. They are nevertheless culpable (18 U.S.C. 4). Corruption
is rife amongst Indiana judiciary. A federal investigation (much
like the Operation Greylord by the FBI in IL) of the Indiana
judiciary is well overdue and is required.
Indiana and Elkhart
courts continue with their abuse of the families and children with
impunity.
-
04.03.2007: Judge
Rex
L. Reed
(pictured
here) and
Elkhart Court hold secret hearing with Gratzol
and
her attorney, Max
Walker,
in Indiana
to
further unlawfully and unconstitutionally eliminate this father's
parental and constitutional rights. Gratzol and Walker coerced and
bribed the undersigned's younger minor daughter into going to
court. No psychological or physical abuse of the child is too
great for Gratzol and Walker to pursue their greed and criminal
violations, and for Reed
to pursue his vendetta against this father.
-
02.20.2007:
Indiana Attorney General Steve
Carter,
his deputies David
A. Arthur
and
Cynthia
G. Denardi
file
appearance to defend crooked judge Rex
L. Reed
for
his crimes
against
the undersigned, his children and the Constitution for the United
States, in a lawsuit brought by the undersigned. Three top Indiana
state attorneys to defend Reed
against Dr. Sanjari, a self-represented father. This implies one
or both of the following:
i) the need for 3 attorneys against
a self-represented non-attorney is a sign of abysmal standard and
quality of Indiana education, and hence its top attorneys,
ii)
the crimes of Reed's
(by
now the A-G's office and the said attorneys are also implicated in
the crimes) are so egregious and heinous that they feel the need
to bring 3 attorneys against the non-lawyer Dr. Sanjari. In any
case it is a waste of Indiana tax payers' money defending a
crooked judge (Rex
L. Reed